< friday 13th/greenpeace
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- jamble
Do they think people will believe that might happen?
Come off it, I'm sick of the whole terrorism thing at the best of times, I'm more worried about losing my job or running out of rice crispies.
If power prices keep rising as they are, nuclear seems a reasonable alternative to me.
- determinedmoth0
Do they think people will believe that might happen?
Come off it
jamble
(Jan 17 06, 03:02)Why couldn't it?
This country (and this forum) was full of a lot paranoid people prior to the London bombings saying such things as the governments' warnings regarding possible terrorist attacks were scare-mongering and simply not real.
Expect anything and nothing.
- stuff0
thats a pretty dark wee video tho...
- determinedmoth0
Surely you could build these things underground anyway?
- its_only_me0
Didnt really expect to see that on their site.
I think they went down the wrong route with that message.
- obsolete0
I agree with you
The reasons to avoid the nuclear route aren't terrorism...
... but maybe people dont care about the real reasons any more.We shouldn't avoid anything because of terrorism...
Maybe if we avoided oil we could avoid terrorism, but that is a hole different subject...
- nowherehead0
To reiterate my own posting - sorry again - that video is toss. You can't live like that: if you don't build things in case some idiot flies a plane into them then why build anything?
- gbz0
I'm really surprised that a group such as GreenPeace would jump on the terror-propaganda bandwagon. Seems really inappropriate to me.
Sure, nuclear isn't great, but as if that would happen.
- uberdesigner0
this will be awesome to watch in 30 years
- determinedmoth0
Sure, nuclear isn't great, but as if that would happen.
gbz
(Jan 17 06, 04:02)As if?!
It already has :/
- pascii0
this is disgusting.
but somehow it is true.
- Bottlerocket0
I think that that ad does greenpeace a major disservice. What an simplistic argument, presented in such scaremongering kind of way. Utter shite.
- tomkat0
hmm
united colors of greenpeace
- chossy0
We do need more nuclear power stations.
- vwsung18t0
hmm, i have a nuclear power plant within 10 miles from my house and a national lab that takes care of nuclear waste within 3 miles. i'm not in a good location if terrorists take that route
- rasko40
hmm it wont play for me but I get the jist.. to have to stoop to the same fear tactics used by Bush and Blair is a sad and pathetic route to take, totally cheapens their message.
- MrMackem0
thats balls.
what sort of family goes to the beach ?
take the little shits to McDonalds you evil cow !
- designerror0
That ad is bullshit. Greenpeace is a bunch of hippies that doesn't have a fucking clue about anything. Maybe they should start looking at the real problems.
A typical coal burning plant spits out 100,000 tons of sulfur dioxide, 75,000 tons of nitrogen oxides, and 5000 tons of fly ash into the environment per year.
On the other hand, a nuclear power plants have controlled waste, and they are environmentally friendly + They have already figured out the best way to dispose of the radioactive material so that it does not have any lasting effects on our environment.
-1 Greenpeace
- Question0
Scare tactics. People eat that shit up.
- tkmeister0
that's a really poor taste. and it's a such a crappy campaign.
i think the scientists need to come up with alternative power source. the goverment should pour money into that.
- mase0
Is that Thurso?
In scotland?