< friday 13th/greenpeace
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- arinya0
that's it! i'm going under ground. Who's with me!!!!
- madirish0
anyone know who did the video and site by chance?
- determinedmoth0
Sure, nuclear isn't great, but as if that would happen.
gbz
(Jan 17 06, 04:02)As if?!
It already has :/
(Jan 17 06, 04:04)Please tell me when the last plane crashed into a nuclear power plant?
gbz
(Jan 17 06, 06:39)You said "as if".
It's already happened to the WTC, it doesn't take a great leap of imagination to do the same to a nuclear power plant.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world…
What makes you so sure it wont?
- v3nt0
greenpeace suck. we need someone else to repersent the environmentaly aware citz.
nuclear aint the answer. we can't dispose of the waste either. we just have to bury it and put that area out of bounds for 10 000 years. if a wind turbine breaks you get a headless rambler.
even in this country - if every house had solar on the south side of the roof it would provide more than half of the needed amount. Fuck russia and thier gas line, blair and his new 'generation' of reactors. Did you know that the reactors in the uk never made any money? it was all subsidised by us tax payers.
- gbz0
Sure, nuclear isn't great, but as if that would happen.
gbz
(Jan 17 06, 04:02)As if?!
It already has :/
(Jan 17 06, 04:04)Please tell me when the last plane crashed into a nuclear power plant?
- uberdesigner0
also, who goes on a picnic with their kids next to a nuclear reactor
- mase0
narley surf there tho (so I hear)
...truly extreme conditions!!!
- kelpie0
oh jesus, what a load of crap. That is truly dreadful. Regardless of what threats might legitimately be around, you can take that shit far too far.
-100000 Greenpeace.
- determinedmoth0
to have to stoop to the same fear tactics used by Bush and Blair is a sad and pathetic route to take, totally cheapens their message.
rasko4
(Jan 17 06, 05:05)Is it still a fear tactic when people start blowing themselves up?
If they'd giving no warnings people would still be up in arms because they said nothing of a "threat".
Greenpeace have always been a bit of joke in my mind anyway. How many fucking boats do they have?! Leave them in dock rather sail round in circles waving a fucking flag and emiting greenhouse gasses surely..
- skt0
Is that Thurso?
In scotland?
mase
(Jan 17 06, 05:37)If it is, that family are already fucked. Those beaches around Dounray are covered in hotspots.
- mase0
Is that Thurso?
In scotland?
- tkmeister0
that's a really poor taste. and it's a such a crappy campaign.
i think the scientists need to come up with alternative power source. the goverment should pour money into that.
- Question0
Scare tactics. People eat that shit up.
- designerror0
That ad is bullshit. Greenpeace is a bunch of hippies that doesn't have a fucking clue about anything. Maybe they should start looking at the real problems.
A typical coal burning plant spits out 100,000 tons of sulfur dioxide, 75,000 tons of nitrogen oxides, and 5000 tons of fly ash into the environment per year.
On the other hand, a nuclear power plants have controlled waste, and they are environmentally friendly + They have already figured out the best way to dispose of the radioactive material so that it does not have any lasting effects on our environment.
-1 Greenpeace
- MrMackem0
thats balls.
what sort of family goes to the beach ?
take the little shits to McDonalds you evil cow !
- rasko40
hmm it wont play for me but I get the jist.. to have to stoop to the same fear tactics used by Bush and Blair is a sad and pathetic route to take, totally cheapens their message.
- vwsung18t0
hmm, i have a nuclear power plant within 10 miles from my house and a national lab that takes care of nuclear waste within 3 miles. i'm not in a good location if terrorists take that route
- chossy0
We do need more nuclear power stations.
- tomkat0
hmm
united colors of greenpeace
- Bottlerocket0
I think that that ad does greenpeace a major disservice. What an simplistic argument, presented in such scaremongering kind of way. Utter shite.