Flash or HTML?
- Started
- Last post
- 37 Responses
- fusionpixel0
here's how my last site turned out using HTML, MySQL and JavaScript. My sister's portfolio:
www.esty.ca
fifty50
(Nov 3 05, 08:40)
----you gotta hot sister there my friend
- version30
learning xml in flash should definitely be a priority if you believe updating an html is faster than flash
done properly you should never have to open the fla again
- jakeyj0
i tend to favor html. to me it seems easier to update.
html makes it searchable without having to hide content, which makes the load time greater, having to pull that extra code. if you've got a high traffic site, that can add up fairly quick.
easier to use with other designers, i'd say too. and if you're just using flash for nav/etc. js should be able to take care of it.
- fifty500
you gotta hot sister there my friend
fusionpixel
(Nov 3 05, 08:56)Haha. nothing about the site, just about the sister...
I think we went over this a few months ago...
- thismanslife0
If you're asking the question Flash or HTML, then i'd say HTML. IF you were tip-top in FLash, good enough to be comfortable doing your folio in it, you would. But if you're asking the wauestion, it says to me, you'd be happier in HTML.
I'm not sure if that made any sense at all :)
- thismanslife0
wauestion??... I meant "question" !
- Jaline0
I like your sister's portfolio. Looks nice.
I prefer HTML to Flash, b/c, personally, it's easier to update, and it can be as challenging or as easy as you want it to be. If you're planning to use CSS/DHTML, etc, then it'll be more complicated, but it'll be worth it.
Just take look at Ian's site:
http://ciaosexy.com/That's what I want to accomplish someday. Hopefully soon.
- Nairn0
You're a dirty whoor for mentioning 'sparkle', mito.
+1 to you! :)
- navitronic0
XHTML/CSS for the content...
Flash and Images for the media.
Search engines will love you and it will be nice to look at.
Hiding stuff behind flash can end up with you being penalised in search engines, I've seen it happen.
Why I am the first person to mention XHTML in this thread??? It's the easiest updateable web technology ever.
- Jaline0
that's what I meant by CSS/DHTML, etc, haha. But yeah, anything that ends with 'HTML' is pretty hot.
- Carty0
dynamic html
- MX_OnD0
if you set it up well enough in Flash at the beggining then it won't take any longer to maintain than a Flash site, all you'd be doing is FTPing text or XML files to your server.
Better still you could make an admin section on an obscure URL accesible by password only of course where you can change the site "live" would work in Flash and PHP for example. With ColdFusion too you could really go mental, go with Flex and it'd be gaga.
*end of plug.
*nice word Nairn, mine is Panache!
- fusionpixel0
Just take look at Ian's site:
ciaosexy.comThat's what I want to accomplish someday. Hopefully soon.
Jaline
(Nov 5 05, 05:02)
---Save AS Webpage, replace the images and walla, you are done reaching your goal.
- fusionpixel0
when done right you can update your site for years, take a look at http://www.joshuadavis.com/
- Jaline0
haha, thanks fusion.
- Jaline0
Oh, and Ian was awesome enough to let me take and play around with his code. Very nice.
- TechVector0
I say use Flash and XML, updating is a cinch via XML.
But what do I know, I'm just a caveman.