Galloway
- Started
- Last post
- 74 Responses
- Cactus
The secret of the demagogue is to make himself as stupid as his audience so that they believe they are as clever as he.
So much for heroes:
http://news.independent.co.uk/wo…
- MX_OnD0
"smokescreen" is precisely right.
Stick it up them again Georgie!!
- kelpie0
we'll see what truth is in these accusations in time, but one things for sure - it wouldn't be the first time the US senate commitee decided they fancied a witch hunt and forgot to factor in the truth...
Galloway's no hero, but I'd slate Bush and his cronies as war profiteers long before him. (imo of course)
- Cactus0
LOL
I'm glad you turned up to defend your tribe. Fitting, for you're the one with the most egg on his face!
- MX_OnD0
LOL
I'm glad you turned up to defend your tribe. Fitting, for you're the one with the most egg on his face!
Cactus
(Oct 25 05, 01:49)At least it's egg pal.
- inspiration0
Wow, 'Cactus' - Tribe!?
If I were looking for a suitably xenophobic response, I might ask "would you prefer if Galloway just put up his hands in surrender"...
- MX_OnD0
Wow, 'Cactus' - Tribe!?
If I were looking for a suitably xenophobic response, I might ask "would you prefer if Galloway just put up his hands in surrender"...
inspiration
(Oct 25 05, 01:57)people like Cactus would shoot anyway even if the hands were up.
- jamble0
Forgive me for not trusting yet another bullshitting American senator. That article doesn't actually present any information that would help the layperson make a decision and based on the "irrefutable evidence" and "smoking guns" found in the WMD hunt in Iraq but I think I'll sit back and watch Galloway tear into the hopeless, lying and corrupt American government.
Just because they say they have evidence, that doesn't actually mean they do you know.
- Cactus0
Your nancygirl responses in defense of this crook are as facile as they are predictable.
But that aside, please answer me this one question before you run for the shelter of pc accusations of "xenophobia."
Why, whatever you may think about Bush and all his doings, do you insist on bringing discredit on the entire Left by defending this obvious demogogue and liar. Don't you realize that you only give ammunition to those who disagree with your positions?
- determinedmoth0
Americans dont need evidence.
Shoot first, ask later.
- MX_OnD0
I vote for all of the following
a worldwide broadcast of Galloway tearing into his accusers, beamed onto the surface of the moon so nae fucker can escape it.
Saddam's lawyers being allowed to call whoever they wish from American and European governments to showcase our role in supplying him with nerve gas.
All criminals to stand trial.
- Cactus0
Just because they say they have evidence, that doesn't actually mean they do you know.
jamble
(Oct 25 05, 02:04)An admirable objectivityyou evidently don't afford to your ideological opponents...
- MX_OnD0
given the evident proliferation of liars, cheats and war criminals in the us administration, not to mention those who have profiteered from the war I find it wholly amusing that you should decide to cry from the rooftops that one wee relatively unimportant british mp should be the sole target of your annoyance.
you sir are utterly myopic and wearing blinkers to boot.
- lowimpakt0
"In this case the remedy is clear - they must charge me with perjury and I am ready to fly to the US today, if necessary, to face such a charge because it is simply false."
charge him and see what happens.
- Cactus0
I thought you would dodge the question. His influence is widespread among persons of your particular political persuasion. Clean off your trot specs and do some reading.
- contra0
Halliburton.
- kelpie0
how well do you actualy know the man cactus? is this the only thread of his political life you're aware of?
I'm interested to hear - I'm busy today, but around lunch time I will try to get back and give you my opinion of a man who was my MP for 8 years of my voting life. It's not all good, he's no angel and has some questionable views, but on this issue I just can't see these allegations as properly founded, and have yet to see any real evidence.
Could you calm down and just relay your views and or evidence so I can try to see things from your perspective please?
- Cactus0
BTW
It was Galloway's good friend, Tariq Aziz, who dropped the dime on him. But of course, he's also an invalid source according to you diehards.
- MX_OnD0
what lowimpakt said.
"His influence is widespread among persons of your particular political persuasion."
Yet not really in the sense of weilding any military power, nor in the sense of holding stakes in companies vying for contracts to rebuild what these very militaries will destroy.
"Clean off your trot specs and do some reading."
Contrary to your shite, I am not in the least communist. If you want to label me I'd suggest humanist.
- paraselene0
"you diehards"?
stirring shit. not interested. ignore.
- MX_OnD0
your rhetoric is very tired Cactus.
"BTW It was Galloway's good friend, Tariq Aziz..."
Similar to Rumsfeld's good friend Saddam Hussein??
We can all find examples of two politicians shaking hands and smiling.