Logo :: C & C
- Started
- Last post
- 16 Responses
- mbr
Any thoughts about these designs would be appreciated.
Thanks.
- stewart0
number 5
but is it
nnbr or
mbr ...
- jk0b0
I second Stewart, but wouldnt be able to guess the name of the studio from any of these logos (could just as well be just "b studios")
- stewart0
yeah, as a logo it may be a bit poor.
- solmo0
i agree with stewart
i allways agree with stewart
he makes nice fish
- jk0b0
Fsh? Really, I could use a good receipe for salmon right now ...
- stewart0
this is a nice one:
- swollenelbow0
keep it gutter, keep it grimey!
To big for me. i like compact logos.
but it may work. hmm, the world will never know...
- jk0b0
great - thanx stewart
- swollenelbow0
stewart loves people.
- solmo0
see
- solmo0
ad some fish to the logo
- mbr0
Yeah, I was not sure about the recognition aspect.
It's a tough one, for me. I presonally like logos that are more 'interesting' than necessarily perfectly legible. That may or may not be a good thing.
The other option, would be to eliminate the STUDIOS and just have it as a semi abstract logo, with MBR Studios below it . hmmm...
Here's a logo I did for another company that my business partner and I have started - the visual relationship is intentional, although I'd welcom thoughts about that, too.
http://www.aestheticmaneuvers.co…
The AM logo was met with much enthusiasm, so I was hoping to aim towards that direction again, esp. considering that both AM and MBR are the same people, just for different things.
- JamesEngage0
they look like they should go on the back of a yamaha keyboard
- Dolan0
I read the AM one as QM, and the M in MBR is not legible. I think you need a solution where each half of the M is not as wide as the other singleton letters --- as is it's looking like 4 letterforms not 3. The lineweights iand curves in the underline areas of #1-4 are off. You're jacking your weights when you h-scale in #5, and I don't understand the relationship between the x-height of the B and the other letters in #5-7. Looks off for no good reason. Interlocking custom forms are tough --- I don't mean to sound harsh, just to give you detailed feedback. Keep on busting.
- Raind0g0
5 is the direction. The other ones have some white space challanges. What sorta business is this?
- mbr0
Thanks for the feedback. I did realize the scale changed the height too much, but wanted to get some feedback before changing them to be correct. The legibility was the main issue with those.
It's a personal logo. I mostly do 3D work for architects/developers/realestate stuff, but some web design once in a while.
I've put off developing one for ages simply because it's been a pain in the ass to come up with something interesting and legible...looks like I'll keep working on it.