Abortion
- Started
- Last post
- 216 Responses
- frow0
The first error here is lumping "Christianity" in with "Religions".
True, Bible-based Christianity is not "religion". Email me... we'll discuss.
- vespa0
Turd burglar...
LOL!
- frow0
HA! Agreed. Long story... but I didn't choose that one.
heheheee.
Don't be scared though... shoot me an email.
- mrdobolina0
noone likes the pompous.
- dstlb0
Note to self: must remember not to lump Christianity in with lesser religions in future.
- frow0
Way to twist words there.
- Mal0
The bible is so bad the author refused to put his name on it.
- unfittoprint0
Ok, bye bye.
- BonSeff0
nice dstlb
- frow0
It's a vibrant, radical and living relationship with a loving savior...
...not cold, dead hypocritical religion.
It was the "religious" people that put Christ on the Cross.
Religion = mankinds' futile attempt to reach God through performance.
Chris follower = God reaching down with a relentless love and offering eternal life through his Son... as a gift.
- mbr0
Pro Choice, all the way.
So who's keeping count?
I guess the more interesting question is how many designers are anti-abortion/Christians?
How many are pro Bush?
- BonSeff0
im all about bush.
- TransFatty0
you lot have the collective IQ of dumpster juice.
all humans do on the matter of their own collective mortality and their so-called ''self-importance'' in the universe.
these debates are un-readable.
- d_t_p0
frow: just some thought.... and i respect your opinions regardless of mine....
first: evolution is observable. its most basic process, natural selection, can be seen happening quite rapidly sometimes. if an animal has a certain mutation that makes it more adaptable to an environment, and survives in that environment when the other doesnt, and reproduces and passes down its mutation.
voila. evolution.
but i dont see any reason people shouldnt be able to combine that with their theories of creation or whatever... just that you cannot ignore that its happening.
now onto the debate about when a fetus is a 'human' or 'baby' or however conservative christians wish to put it. i'm just curious what you suggest is the importance of saying that the embryo has all of the genetic material? of course it does, we've known that for years. (yet you say 'scientists have confirmed this'). but does that mean it has feelings? that it feels pain? that it does anything except divide cellularly and absorb nutrients? for a significant portion of early pregnancy, this is only a lump of cells. not a baby.
and to clarify something... when you see those pictures of mutilated fetuses that conservative christians show in front of abortion clinics... ask them if they think thats how abortions are performed. nearly all of them say yes. that is partial birth abortion and is very rarely performed... only when the mothers life is in immediate danger or there is some other emergency. there are only a handful of those. period. i was almost punched by a 'christian' when i explained that to him.
- Mal0
Bless you Fatty, you are the voice of reason in a sea of bullshit.
- Mal0
pro-choice here. btw.
- unknown0
Im pro-choice when it comes to answering to threads as well.
- Nairn0
Where IS Waldo??
- motivdesign0
frow: the 2nd law of thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems.
Just so you know.
- unknown0
I love the new 17inch...