Kamala of the day

Out of context: Reply #133

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 172 Responses
  • doggydoggdog17

    “Government of the people, by the people, and for the people”

    And yet, they still do donations/fundraising, and ads, and lies, and stupidity.

    The whole system is exhausting.

    • Corporations firstYakuZoku
    • soooo... only republicans can fund-raise?

      Trump supporters get dumber by the minute these days..
      hydro74
    • doggy here is a big fan of the grift for fundraiser, or stealing from charities for startersimbecile
    • https://iea.org.uk/w…yuekit
    • Campaigns need money. “The people” can support them with donations. Where is this not happening?monospaced
    • Loads of the companies just fund both people, so no matter who loses they still win.PhanLo
    • It's rigged!palimpsest
    • Corporations have more money hence they run shitYakuZoku
    • Campaign Finance Reform https://www.youtube.…bezoar
    • I would love to see a total ban on donations and only publicly funded campaigns on equal terms for both parties.CyBrainX
    • YupYakuZoku
    • she's on the hook for Joe's AIPAC millions now, so don't expect any change in policy, as if there would be. she's just as zesty for genocide as Joe is.face_melter
    • You guys are being naive about how all this works. First of all, many of those donations are from small donors so it's not necessarily a bad thing.yuekit
    • In USA one person can donate a maximum of $3,300 to a candidate. Aside from that there are also independent "political action committees" that can haveyuekit
    • unlimited funding thanks to the Citizens United decision, but these PACs are outlawed from directly coordinating their ads and other efforts with the campaign.yuekit
    • So that part definitely opens the door to corruption -- this was how Elon Musk was planning to spend $50 million/month to elect Trumpyuekit
    • Democrats opposed that change but they eventually began doing the same thing themselves since otherwise they will never win an election.yuekit
    • However groups that people probably like such as unions are also very influential on the Democratic side. It's not all corrupt billionairesyuekit
    • A 2004 paper from Princeton showed 'the people' have almost no influence over US Gov't policy or decision-making.i_monk
    • ^ During W's presidency, when that was more true than today. There's also the Electoral College that pretends Americans don't know how to count.CyBrainX
    • That study said the rich's policies get implemented more often. Maybe not surprising considering Congress are a bunch of rich people.yuekit
    • https://x.com/DrJill…Khurram
    • Two cheeks of the same sweaty arse.Khurram
    • So you support Jill Stain now? No more Trump?yuekit
    • H0rshOepalimpsest

View thread