blog

Out of context: Reply #73487

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 76,751 Responses
  • jagara15

    I wonder what's up with the merry band of universally hated QBN members. Do they get off on being downvoted by a very small internet community? Why are they here, and not Twitter or something? At least their shitty opinions would get upvotes from the asshole community.

    jagara 15Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • negative attention is still attention. like kids who act out because their parents don't careimbecile
    • Milan would not be able to get their rocks off being an asshole if they spent time with people as abhorrent as themselves etcimbecile
    • weird thing is there's always, without question, a troll or two balancing the ship. like some kind of qbn law of physics.inteliboy
    • But downvotes are worthless. Witness the latest Joe Rogan video - a profound talk by Saghguru - it's at minus 3 or something already...
      ********
    • ... and I guarantee those downvotes were given relfexively.
      ********
    • No heed given to the meat of what Sadhguru and Joe talked about. Boosh... a smug auto-downvote.
      ********
    • You can’t guarantee jack shit bobo.monospaced
    • shut it slag
      ********
    • "spin on it" *makes middle finger gesture*
      ********
    • lol, you do realize you’re one of them right?monospaced
    • This place is an echo chamber of sorts. Some people want a negative echo, some positive. It's tribal, predictable, comforting and dishonest. There are phases...Morning_star
    • ...where new 'disrupters' become prominent but ultimately get the flick. And Once a year someone asks the same questions as you did Jagara, and the answers...Morning_star
    • ...are always exactly as you'd expect. Dull, predictable and dishonest.Morning_star
    • The cyclical view of history is seductive.
      ********
    • Much like Heroin.Morning_star
    • Echo chamber? How come we disagree with each other so often? Even with the none *troll. There is also difference in disagreeing and dishonest trolling.pango
    • Morning star. I can see that many people disagree with you. But I don't see you trolling.pango
    • I was always taught it's weak to troll. Where possible, attack the idea, not the person.Morning_star
    • All in all we may disagree here but the practicalities of really going at it are limited due the the restrictions of 'this' response mechanism.Morning_star
    • I think the point here is there are a few people that spew bullshit, and when they get called out with facts they fucking slink like no other.garbage
    • They're disingenuous or actual morons, and all they care about is the stain they left on the wall.garbage
    • Ironically, they view themselves as the most informed, smartest members of qbn.monospaced
    • “attack the idea, not the person” - wise words @Morning_starmort_
    • echo chamber? people argue here constantlyinteliboy
    • I like turtlesGuyFawkes
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread