Adobe buys Macromedia

Out of context: Reply #14

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 15 Responses
  • sted3

    Let us remember the Macromedia VS Adobe lawsuit, what went down because they haven't bought a license on a feature that allows users of design software to rearrange the work space on the PC screen called "tabbed palettes".

    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edg…

    Long live FIGMA! :D hehh
    cheers graphicician.

    • This is the strangest archeological thread dig in QBN history.CyBrainX
    • On (release) {
      gotoAndStop (666);
      }
      GuyFawkes
    • @CyBrainX had to dig out this gem :)sted
    • ActionScriptutopian
    • WHEN THE HELL DID THIS HAPPEN! COLDFUSION FTW!hydro74
    • You're a weird one stedgrafician
    • Yeah i bet it feels weird to get burned at 3am in Romania for the 2nd time. There will be a third no worries.sted
    • But what are you even talking about?
      What is this have to do with Figma?!
      grafician
    • And I said YOU'RE WEIRD, as a human being staying up late in the night to search for 17 years old posts nobody asked forgrafician
    • This post exists because of grafician notes on patents and figma, and to show how incompetent he is: https://www.qbn.com/…sted
    • Thanks I forgot to link the original post. hehhehsted
    • Yeah I said Adobe is not buying Figma.
      Then you stepped in with some bullshit about patents

      So what's your point AGAIN?
      grafician
    • Nobody talked to you, my note was for utopian, but you had to step in to start the usual brainfarts what ended up you being completely wrong about the topic.sted
    • And again:
      Nobody talked to you.
      You started attacking me.
      You were wrong 100%.
      sted
    • And this is the second time this happens.sted
    • You clearly live in an "alternate facts" universe where the same words have different meanings for your brain

      Add @username if you address someone directly
      grafician
    • @sted you still haven't proved Adobe buys Figma or Figma owes anything to Adobe for any patent or whatever bullshit you were trying to saygrafician
    • SO WHAT IS YOUR POINT YOU WERE TRYING TO MAKE, ASKING AGAIN AND AGAIN?!

      LITERALLY ASKING YOU so we can move the fuck along
      grafician
    • @sted POSTING RANDOM LINKS IS NOT MAKING A POINT DO. YOU GET THIS?!grafician
    • Not feeling to tell anything especially
      when its asked with caps.
      I got what I wanted.
      sted
    • https://c.tenor.com/…sted
    • Lol you got shit

      Don't worry, people around here can actually read, unlike you

      You proved nothing, just made a mess again of any decent discussion
      grafician
    • @sted YOU NEVER HAD a point, you need to use words and explain yourself and your ideas when asked okay?
      That is called a discussion, look it up
      grafician
    • Anyway I feel sorry for you sted, NORMAL PEOPLE don't go into decades old threads and add random posts to try to start some shitgrafician
    • awww what is it you haven't got enough sleep? woke up with anger?
      my answer was 100% relevant since this was a significant event on the adobe macromedia deal.
      sted
    • and this thread is one out of 15 on this subject full with relevant posts to your ridiculous anger. like: https://www.qbn.com/…sted
    • Finished my 3rd beer, going to sleep now.Not hoping that you're going to learn the key aspects how patents work, or an apology for turning this post personal.sted
    • Burned for sure. And triggered AF.
      And Adobe absolutely could buy figma in a heartbeat if they wanted to.
      monospaced
    • No apology will ever come. Just more condescension and insults and denial.monospaced
    • My biggest fear is mentioning ActionScript during an interview if After Effects expressions come up in conversation and getting "OK Boomer" insults.CyBrainX
    • Did we just witness a stroke in notes?garbage
    • @CyBrainX https://imgix.gizmod…
      and i would ask: when can you start?
      sted

View thread