blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #63511
- Started
- Last post
- 76,751 Responses
- iCanHazQBN2
^ "Mathematically speaking, a circle is the set of points in a plane that are equidistant from a given point. For a circle to be perfect, you’d need all those points in the circle’s circumference to match up exactly. And for all those points to match up exactly you’d need this precision to remain constant no matter how closely you looked: the particles, the cells, the atoms... And are these “points” stationary or are they in motion? The maddening search for perfection simply breaks down."
- If you zoom in close enough, then no, of course there are no perfect circles.iCanHazQBN
- and all those points = infinity so therefore no perfect circle can ever exist in nature.fadein11
- wow - you just realised this? not being mean just interested.fadein11
- I didn't know what "perfect" meant in this context. That's all.iCanHazQBN
- Not if its vector!!!pango
- using mathematics, circles are perfectmonospaced
- https://www.youtube.…yurimon
- if you observe wave motion from a center. interesting to investigate this in regards to wave motion in nature, frequency. depending also the resistance in a wavyurimon
- you will get a perfect circle perhaps depending on a wave pattern/frequency/en... as attributes perhaps.yurimon
- https://www.youtube.…imbecile
- yuri, you are wrong.imbecile
- beyond physical world we perceive we dont know if there is anything more round or similar effect that is symmetrical as circle in wave functionyurimon
- if you are talking about a perfect circle in nature its hard to assume unless you see all phenomenon but yes i see this from man made perspectiveyurimon
- yuri is likely right heremonospaced