documentaries
documentaries
Out of context: Reply #508
- Started
- Last post
- 1,633 Responses
- sem0
Sorry ZOOP but I can't have you suggesting that bias American WW2 crap here. It is beyond ignorant and insulting, I mean, not only does it miss out years of war by spends 10 seconds on North Africa?!
It was written by the kind of idiots they say America "saved" everyone in WW2.
You'll have a hard time finding an un-bias well funded doc about WW2, here is something that should be remembered from it all though, the creation of the Atom Bomb.
- not at all, the focus was on the main theaters yes, but the overall facts are true; and criticize the U.S.ZOOP
- U.S.S.R. payed the price in lives beyond any other, but U.S. reaped the benefit beyond allZOOP
- It is a terrible doc, check the comments on that youtube video. It is embarrassingly bias.sem
- if fact the allies were going to ignore Africa altogether, seen by most as diversionaryZOOP
- Nazi's not being able to invade USSR & Britain played massive roles, yet they focus from 41?! gtfosem
- i just focused on the post WW stats, as posted above the vid, would be best to go back further than 1:27:12 thoughZOOP
- The war in North Africa went on for 2 years mate, hardly ignoring Africa.sem
- it's a bit of H.C. bubblegum of course, all I wanted to point out was the synapsesZOOP
- Only 1 general supported landing in north Africa, it almost didn't happen was my pointZOOP
- the doc has a major slant, agreed, I assumed most viewing the post are better educated than Americans :/ZOOP
- there are numerous docs on WW2, but none encapsulated the stats like the end of this oneZOOP
- yep - a truly awful documentaryfadein11
- agreed, I had to see wtf they claimed as being "from space" total bullshit, only thing interesting was the endZOOP
- didn't mean for anyone to sit through all the tripe, just the end stats and how the U.S. took full advantage, my badZOOP