logo critique

Out of context: Reply #11

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 40 Responses
  • inkpink0

    and yeah not quite the right font in my opinion... did you try a wide Clarendon?

    still retro and the curves in the Egyptian serifs would be welcome.

    inkpink 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • nice suggestion. a little bit softer.baseline_shift
    • < i can't stand this. horrible.
      ********
    • i guess "bracketed" serif would be teh correct lingo.inkpink
    • nice one ! ;)andreiom
    • admit there's some bad characters but i think it would workinkpink
    • That is NOT what Clarendon Extended looks like. Those letterforms have bene totally jacked with.duckofrubber
    • I take it back, it seems to be...duckofrubber
    • even if it wasn't jacked with, it's still jacked up. look at that lowercase e and x. abysmal.
      ********
    • yeah i was surprised by the image.. not what i recall my copy looking like...inkpink
    • but whatever the "union" here is fineinkpink
    • Clarendon = starbuck's over used type face on their products, don't go thereakoni
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread