FoxNews "Green"
Out of context: Reply #38
- Started
- Last post
- 41 Responses
- mikotondria30
Ok, to take that graph showing the trend from 1920...
thats 80 years ago, show us the graph going back 200 years, 500, 1000, 10000, 100000 - then you will get a sense of the warming and cooling trends that go on, cycles within cycles, within cycles, mostly generated and influenced by the regulations of the sun and the milancovich cycle, equinoxial precesssion,etc.
Carbon dioxide, the greatest scourge of our generation, so we would be lead to believe, is actually a pretty crap greenhouse gas. It's relationship to climatic heating is not well understood, but its relative concentration in the atmosphere can be shown to lag behind global temperature by several hundred years. Think about it... The temperature going up *causes* an increase in carbon dioxide levels, NOT the other way around.
The bedrock of anthopogenic climate heating is based on the fact that naughty humans are disrupting the carbon cycle and causing climate change over the couse of a few decades, but the evidence is absolutely not there for this, nor are there any accurate models of the process.
Please please study some palaeoclimatology before you start legislating against my fuking lightbulbs, or posting your crap on the internet.
It is not, and never has been, a clear cut argument, Al Gore is a fuckwit, history will judge him to be an alarmist crackpot, and your children will laugh at you in 15 years if you don't change your mind on this.- yeah 'equinoxial precesssion' like the TOOTH FAIRYmonNom
- =PmonNom
- jesus h...This is like people on a forum about knitting trying to discuss genetic engineering.mikotondria3