Hackers just killed global warming
- Started
- Last post
- 215 Responses
- Iggyboo0
What a waste of effort, this is purely politics. On a scientific level its concerning, and if our short lives can prove anything its that atleast in the northeast here of USA it has been warming in the past 20 years drastically. 70 degrees in January isn't unheard of anymore. As far as the ice glaciers melting they can't predict how fast it will happen but they know it will.. so everyone is aware whether its co2 emissions or not we're warming up. Lets just figure out how to deal with it and stop bitching about it. Its maybe just nature, but its likely its man made, and either way it doesn't matter. We all should be concerned because the consequences of ignoring it could be as high as Hurricane Katrina looking like a cute rain cloud. Public policy has to go in place around the world not just in US. And we're pretty much just as much of a culprit for pollution as any other nation, so I am all for paying off nations to not fuck up their climate any more than they already have. Like the brazillian rain forests etc, if the co2 emissions are really needed to be deleted we'll need as many plants on the earth as possible to keep it in balance.
- Iggyboo0
Nitrogen
- http://answers.yahoo…Iggyboo
- Oh you said green house gas.Iggyboo
- ukit0
- That is pollution not man made glolbal warming. That just shows the level of education you have. ZERO.FredMcWoozy
- zenmasterfoo0
the biggest problem is that if the data is truly compromised then the research moving global governments (including the usa) to accept climate control measures will jeopardize their passage. not that i care...i would rather have stable scientific data before passing any legislation, not possible corrupt information driving cash into the hands of the jolly green giant.
- They're not climate control measures, you can't control climate. They're people control measures.raf
- It is not possible corruption. It is corruption. it is scientific fraud, these idiots are delusional.FredMcWoozy
- this is true.zenmasterfoo
- FredMcWoozy0
So now people don't know the difference between the argument of pollution vs man made global warming?
Friggin Idiots. Ukit and Utopian must be children. No way they're are older then 20.
- I see a lot of delusion on this site and it is hilarious.FredMcWoozy
- ukit0
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yea please, explain to us how "pollution" and sending greenhouse gases into the environment are two different things Fred...
Hilarious stuff...
- ukit0
What is that coming out of the smokestack? Cotton candy?
- morilla0
Mcdouchebag, so man has no detriment on the world whatsoever? Everything is tied together you baffoon. It's your level of education that is shocking.
- GeorgesII0
WHAT HAS GREENHOUSE EVER DONE TO YOU UKIT!!
- ukit0
Nothing...I just think it's sad that people can be so easily misled
The funny part is that you all are prepared to throw away the work of the majority of climate scientists on the planet based on a few e-mails...
But you are totally willing to buy into a conspiracy that GW is a hoax to "control people" based on no evidence at all...
- Not on a few emails, but on 13 years of emails from/to a leading climate institute, to be precise...raf
- ukit0
Fine, don't believe GW if you want...
But why not apply the same standard of disbelief to the "conspiracy" that you do to the global warming?
At least then you'd be consistently skeptical of everything;)
- GeorgesII0
No, Ukit, I'm just sick of people not actually doing any reasearch and taking what they here on TV, radio as facts. (saddam has......, lies, lies and lies)
-
-
The CRU is the main source of DATA for the whole climate change debate, if its proven that they have deleted or hidden key info, to make their case bigger and scarier, then its simply not a fraud but a criminal act.
-
I've discussed this ad nauseum with friends here, the consensus on man made global warming is not as partisan as you think it is, lots of real good scientist have claimed that earth have been through phases of warming and cooling and man didn't even exist in those days.
The point here is I'm not saying "Yeah lets fuckn pollute, fuck the earth, dude I'm so fuckn that polar bear, etc", the thing is they should give everyone the data so every scientist can compile it freely without beeing ostracized as a "denier" (denier of what?) for questioning the results (they never did)
-
you know it doesn't take a genius or a denier to find out that there's something wrong when you say everyone agree and is secure about mmgw, in theoric science you can never be sure of something, the biggest supercomputers can't even project what weather it will be in 5 days and you want me to believe that those same computers can predict how the weather will be in 2050. And as soon as you here computer model, you should know that it will vary depending of the input you put into it, I'm pretty sure if I fart right now, the air displacement will create a tornado on the other part of the world, you'll never know. The climate changes, it always do and always will, but we don't know enough yet about the dynamics of weather to be thinking of taxing all of us for something that is not 99% sure.
-
I know I'm going to get the usual reply,so I'll tell you right now, I couldn't care less about this debate, everyone has its position and no matter what comes out nobody will move. anyways, in 2 weeks there's Copenhagen and if they say yes you can all rejoices and I will to, believe me I will.
- GeorgesII0
btw because conspiracy is on the lips of everyone, what can you call this.
from our good frieng G. Monbiot (if you don't know who he is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geo… )
read this from a man you can't say is a global warming denier.
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/…
-
But do these revelations justify the sceptics’ claims that this is “the final nail in the coffin” of global warming theory?(8,9) Not at all. They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. They raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of several hundred lines of evidence. To bury manmade climate change, a far wider conspiracy would have to be revealed. Luckily for the sceptics, and to my intense disappointment, I have now been passed the damning email which confirms that the entire science of global warming is indeed a scam. Had I known that it was this easy to rig the evidence, I wouldn’t have wasted years of my life promoting a bogus discipline. In the interests of open discourse, I feel obliged to reproduce it here.
- ukit0
Anyway...back to my original point
Let's see the evidence for the international global warming conspiracy/ New World Order you guys believe in, and it better hold up to the same rigorous standard you expect of professional climate research
Cos otherwise you are being biased, right?
- identity0
Man1: Long Entry
Man2: Feigns interest in Man1's entry, pours out own LONG entry
Man1: Feigns interest in Man2's entry, pours out another long entry
Man2: Feigns interest in Man1's seconday long entry, pours out 2nd long entry
...etc...