Hackers just killed global warming
- Started
- Last post
- 215 Responses
- ukit0
The other question is whether greenhouse gas concentration in the atmosphere increased over the same time period, which it did.
- In fairness, it's not like we are qualified to discuss facts. We discuss beliefs, doubts, policies, agendas, fears, trends, etc.raf
- No, this is just scienceukit
- Raf, then why do you have a superior attitude? Like you have FACTS others are unaware of?DrBombay
- Superior attitude? Do you own a mirror? :) I'm just saying there are grounds for doubt and that I don't agree that worst..raf
- ...case scenario if CO2 turns out harmless is that we'll have less pollution, so we should ban CO2 based on current data.raf
- ukit0
- ukit0
- ukit0
Yup, clearly this is just a crazy, far fetched theory that some scientists made up.
- calcium0
I don't believe it.
I only believe Glen Beck. He says it doesn't exist and if we do believe in global warming we hate America and hopes it dies.
- FredMcWoozy0
I am now convinced UKIT is a climate NAZI.
Hilarious!!! LOL This guy UKIT is so brainwashed he can't even read the article, let alone walk outside lol
Freaking hilarious.
UKIT is the perfect government slave. lol
- ukit0
I'm part of the Bilderberg group Fred. Here to spread disinfo
- calcium0
I am now convinced that FredMcWoozy is a cartoon.
Look! It's formatted like an email, with email addresses, obscure subject matters, and people who are easily looked up. It MUST be real!
I read the article. The Onion poses more convincing evidence than that.
- identity0
I would have thought with all the ice melting, there would be some room freed up for a debate/opposing view-points? Guess not...
- ukit0
Debate/oppose viewpoints away. All I did was post a few images from the Wikipedia entry on global warming.
- wikipedia is your source? LMAO, it is only getting funnier lol These are the type of people we are up against? LMAOFredMcWoozy
- FredMcWoozy0
it is clear some people should read this.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/scien…
and
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noe…
Gore prominently quotes Deuteronomy, "I’m offering you the choice of life or death."
- FredMcWoozy0
Hey UKIT.
Plants breathe C02.
What do you think the C02 level was during the jurrasic period? It was a lot higher then it was now.
- and the earth was a tropical jungle. c02 levels keep rising and it gets hot, point made.eieio
- mathinc0
At the end of the day shouldn't we ONLY be concerned that the people producing the data from which we formulate our decisions perform their duties free of political agenda? I mean, you cunts can go round and round with your opinions but obviously if the 'facts' are fucked then we're all just sitting here masturbating. As far as I'm concerned any scientist who tints their findings to suit an outcome is a human travesty.
- especially if they are librullz!DrBombay
- I feel sad for you. When you were birthed I'll bet that more than one person had such high hopes.mathinc
- Now look at you.. a petty failure who constantly projects his sensibilities on others in a fucking graphic design forum...mathinc
- the facts aren't fucked though purely independent observations have been made and the conclusion is MMCCeieio
- But that's kind of my point, you don't know what is 'fact' anymore and shit like these emails makes a convoluted topicmathinc
- Idea that you can't know facts because of a couple e-mails is kinda silly, no?ukit
- even more suspect of agenda. We already have instances where the naysayers of man-made climate change getting paid by politically biasedmathinc
- entities. Where is the truth? That's what we need.mathinc
- ukit, is it a couple of emails or a glimpse into an atmosphere of proving a pre-conceived outcome? Simplifying it as 'amathinc
- couple emails' seems like you're dismissing the larger implications.mathinc
- By your logic then does funding by Exxon mean that a study is invalid? No, but I don't think it can be taken very seriously either.mathinc
- I think some of you guys just want 'your side' to win. But why ...mathinc
- your non-participation angle is tired and useless, it allows you to thumb your nose at everything and feel superior while not really standing for anything.DrBombay
- while not really standing for anything.DrBombay
- Now how can a non-partisan angle be tired and old?? It's simple cucky boy, I decide for myself, I don't need a party tomathinc
- tell me how to feel about the issues.mathinc
- The only issue you have is "no taxes" and other such pipe dreams. "I want the truth!"DrBombay
- Who the fuck doesn't? You scream loud as hell and generally say jack shit.DrBombay
- Here is a news flash, everyone has an agenda, everyone is cooking the books to nudge it along. Wake up.DrBombay
- And with that, fuck off. Our conversations never go anywhere. You never take a position all you do is bag on everyone who does.DrBombay
- people who do.DrBombay
- I condemn ALL scientists who tint scientific findings. <-- There is where I stand. If it's not partisan enough for you to throwmathinc
- stones at then I'm really sorry. I know you want to fight with me and I also know that it makes it really hard to fight when I say sillymathinc
- silly shit like, 'I think we're entitled to the truth.' If I had said something like 'Global warming is fake!' then you'd know what tomathinc
- We all know where you stand on the issue. So you look for reasons to believe that angle.DrBombay
- say. But I didn't, so I know you're just confused and lashing out. Cause you REALLLLY want to fight with memathinc
- You have expressed your opinion on this subject before. Remember?DrBombay
- Now go off yourself.DrBombay
- I just really hope that if there is such a thing as reincarnation, that you come back with the ability to think logically. I think youmathinc
- you kinda got the short end of the stick on this go'round. I was just kind of wondering while I was sitting here writing this.. butmathinc
- being that you're such a proponent of helping the little guy.. how do you find time? What with sitting on this site.. 6 hours?mathinc
- 8 hrs? 10 hrs? a day fighting with people. think of all the positive things you could be doing! Not to late to fix things.mathinc
- You can still make right all that's wrong with you. Or just chalk this up as an attack on your character, which it is. And respondmathinc
- respond, which you will undoubtedly do. Nasty little cycle you got going on here.mathinc
- I havent been around here much at all lately. It is fucking hilarious how you try to use that shit every single time thoughDrBombay
- Canned arguments. All you care about is taxes, which shows how shallow you actually are.DrBombay
- Last Word.mathinc
- pr20
1. There is very few branches of science that produce unquestionable answers. Most jump to the most likely conclusion.
2. Ever, and i mean EVERY, institution,person of interest etc. has an agenda. Sometimes this agenda is pure (let's save kittens, for instance) but more often the agenda is tinted by many outside influences thus assuming that the people should be "honest" because they are scientist is a bit naive.
3. Claim that CO2 isn't toxic. Of course it's not! All in moderation is fine, it's just that there is no moderation and we are pumping tons and TONS of that shit in the air. If by some miracle all the factories in the world would start pumping in the air pure oxygen we would be fucked too because too much of one is never good.
4. Many of the "global warming isn't real" people above forget to take in consideration how the general public's mind works. The public doesn't hear we are being fooled to follow some theory that doesn't have validity, what they DO hear is "Great now i can go back to my old ways of never ending consumerism where nothing counts, because the whole climate change ain't real." Thus raising such a debate produces 2 consequences, one searching for truth, second most people will abandon their already scant environmental efforts.
- gramme0
Of course global warming is happening, we've just been collectively mistaken about what caused it.
See, there's this hot yellow thing in the sky...
- OSFA0
100SFA!!!!