Global warming...
- Started
- Last post
- 1,047 Responses
- unfittoprint0
the only way republicunts
would care about global warming
is to blame it on gay marriage.
- flagellum0
Mimio: you're shifting the topic. Why? How is the age of the earth relevant to this discussion?
For the record, you can read this paper to find out where I stand on the earth and it's age... as it directly pertains to an upper and lower register concept of nonlinear time:
- flagellum0
designaked: why do you feel sorry for me? What do you believe my view is on this issue?
- Mimio0
Well, I'll wait till later to read your 48-page paper (or maybe not), why don't you answer the question in your own plain words?
- designaked0
flagellum, do you have a job?
also too, you seem to be one of the least faithful persons I have ever come across.
I gotta get back to work.
- PonyBoy0
Enter response:
you feel sorry for me?
I'm lost - I agree with you on being good to our planet for you, me and those to come...
... I don't agree with how how self-assumingly 'smart' the folks who have deciphered mearly 100+ of weather data think they are about our earth...
... that's arrogant - but you go on feeling sorry for me... it's nice actually. :)
- Mimio0
Pony,
They're able to look much further back than 100 years in terms of climate change, but I'm sure you already know that, and probably aren't interested.
- flagellum0
how am I "unfaithful", designaked?
Mimio: The simple answer is (although this doesn't communicate the full context of my viewpoint) that I believe that the earth is old, as we understand old in our linear understanding of time.
- khilled0
garett_west is a crack head in denial
- flagellum0
mimio: start on page 15 of that paper. Although it might be a little confusing if you haven't read the preceeding pages.
- Mimio0
Time is in fact linear in this universe. So it's safe to use the concept of years to talk about time.
- PonyBoy0
Enter response:
mimio... i'm SUPER INTERESTED... you'd be suprised what people are 'interested in' if stop attacking them for what they believe. :)
I'm arguing my thoughts on the arrogance of assuming 'fact' in science study... (not that I've really been discussing this: but to then go so far as to make a movie about and use it as your political platform..)
And the data you're referring to is geological I presume?
I LOVE THIS STUFF... :) I'm a science-freak, dude...
... granted I'm more into physics (motion, energy... how things add up logically)... but, yikes duder... I'm just attacking this 'politically'...
... I love science... as much as I love art and design - it's just... not... fact. Science is 'the study of'...
... our knowledge changes SO MUCH from decade to decade - just as our technology does.
- Republican0
"I'm going to go with an MIT atmospheric scientist over political policy makers with special interests any day of the week.
flagellum
(Jul 7 06, 07:01)"+10
- flagellum0
mimio: I agree to an extent. However there is a tremendous amount we do not understand about the nature of time. Our concept of a historical/natural chronology of time may be a construct of limited little human brains. I believe there is reason to think so. Namely, the evidence of a fallen creation.
Read that paper.
- designaked0
PonyBoy, would you have believed "An Inconvenient Truth" if it were narrated by the dude from NOVA?....or, at the minimum, would it have been more believable to you?
- Mimio0
Question, Dr. Lindzen (MIT) believes humans are partly to blame for global warming. He's no climate change skeptic.
- Mimio0
I might read it for fun. I don't usaully mix my science with Jesus and superntaural curses. Which that paper does.
- designaked0
I don't usaully mix my science with Jesus and superntaural curses. Which that paper does.
Mimio
(Jul 7 06, 13:15)+100
- khilled0
I only beleive David Suzuki.