Public Voice Network
- slightly worrying? 2828
- Grooverider-4 years priso… 7272
- Flex 3 problem 33
- Dancin cop 44
- QBN MOLESKINE PROJECT 219219
- EC: Ben Frost is Dead 44
- 2 karagarga invites for a… 55
- EC: Ben Frost 55
- olympics logo 1414
- Politics 120120
- 5th September 77
- 23K 1616
- another logo 3030
- Canon 5D Mark II 1717
- blog 2462024620
- Show some old work 1111
- type question 2323
- cant remember this move: 11
- time machine on a mac 22
- Examples of Dynamic Flash 44
- Camera icons 22
- there should only be 4 th… 2929
- 70's designs 55
- Timmmaaayyy 77
Global warming... 10251025 Responses
Last post: 5 months, 1 week ago | Thread started: Jul 7, 06, 6:38 a.m.
- garett_west
must not be as bad as last year, or, have as much of an affect as 'scientists' thought as last year at this time there were 5 hurricanes/tropical storms by this day. Arlene. Bret. Cindy. Dennis. Emily.
This year. One, and it was never above a Tropical Storm.
So how about a big round of gfy's to the global warming conspicatists who thought it was affecting the weather.
haha. So funny. Choke on it.
- Jul 7, 06, 6:38 a.m. – Permalink
- garett_west
Oh, and those 5 were all in the Atlantic, Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico. Forgot to mention the 4 that were in the Eastern Pacific.
Adrian. Beatriz. Calvin and Dora.
This year... 2. Both Tropical Depressions. haha.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:41 a.m. – Permalink
- garett_west
I guess the truth hurts eh?
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:42 a.m. – Permalink
- WildFlower
are you a complete retard or is it just the interpretation of statistical meteorological data you have no understanding of?
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:44 a.m. – Permalink
- WildFlower
and identifying longterm climate trends. I was gunna put that in my last sentence but that woulda made it way too complicated for him to understand, as my money is on him being a complete retard.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:45 a.m. – Permalink
- garett_west
yeah, I'm sure one (year) discrepancy dismisses everything about global warming.
Jaline
(Jul 7 06, 06:43)Lets think about that for a moment shall we.
Last year. 2005... was... one... year. One. So wouldn't your statement be true for the other side of the coin and everyone who jumped onto the Global Warming bandwagon?
Oh Jaline.... tsk tsk.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:47 a.m. – Permalink
- garett_west
are you a complete retard or is it just the interpretation of statistical meteorological data you have no understanding of?
WildFlower
(Jul 7 06, 06:44)I just spent an hour studying the data and made my conclusion. You on the other hand pulled your opinion from your ass and are the only true retard here.
Way to have a conversation like an adult WildFlower.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:49 a.m. – Permalink
- Jaline
yeah, I'm sure one (year) discrepancy dismisses everything about global warming.
Jaline
(Jul 7 06, 06:43)Lets think about that for a moment shall we.
Last year. 2005... was... one... year. One. So wouldn't your statement be true for the other side of the coin and everyone who jumped onto the Global Warming bandwagon?
Oh Jaline.... tsk tsk.
garett_west
(Jul 7 06, 06:47)except people have been talking about global warming for years.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:52 a.m. – Permalink
- flagellum
"Alarm rather than genuine scientific curiosity, it appears, is essential to maintaining funding. And only the most senior scientists today can stand up against this alarmist gale, and defy the iron triangle of climate scientists, advocates and policymakers."
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:52 a.m. – Permalink
- WildFlower
ha, we got a live one!
he's been studying the data for a WHOLE HOUR!!!
if anything, the borthers thorough. Heh.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:54 a.m. – Permalink
- WildFlower
oh man i hate the wall street journal. The amount of shit that is published in that paper beggars belief. Like holy.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:55 a.m. – Permalink
- WildFlower
Hehe flagellum, there's a hot and lively debate happening out there to be sure. But the Wall Street Journal, the opinions it consistently pushes, and the "experts" it prints, it's nauseating how right-wing it is.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:58 a.m. – Permalink
- garett_west
ha, we got a live one!
he's been studying the data for a WHOLE HOUR!!!
if anything, the borthers thorough. Heh.
WildFlower
(Jul 7 06, 06:54)I would hope it wouldn't take you longer than an hour to read the site. It's basic common sense knowledge.
- Dog-earJul 7, 06, 6:59 a.m. – Permalink
