Intelligent design
- Started
- Last post
- 690 Responses
- TheTick0
Wait...are manpurses made out of actual....men??!!!
- mikotondria20
ROFL at Ticks comment at the end of the Genesis quote, that was some fn funny smartasstistry there dude :)
- discipler0
pavlov
An insect remains an insect, even if it has an apendage which adapts to it's environment. You have no jump in genome. There are limitations - as science observes. And there has never been an information gaining mutation within a species, information is always lost.
The point I was making is that there is no unguided mechanims that can produce information and thus a new species from a former species and there is not a shred of REAL evidence of this.
- pavlovs_dog0
Ah, Tick has bought into the lies and propaganda. And still is avoiding the science.
discipler
(Oct 7 05, 10:36)Dude, you wouldn't know science if it held you down and sodomized you 'till your nose bled.
- ribit0
"irreducible complexity and digital information require a designer"
If you mean an intelligent designer, as opposed to a natural design process, I dont think that has been proved. Seems to me that natural systems can do this stuff much better...
- TheTick0
ROFL at Ticks comment at the end of the Genesis quote, that was some fn funny smartasstistry there dude :)
mikotondria2
(Oct 7 05, 10:39)
-----------------------
Finally, someone gets me. You really get me!! I'm buying you a manpurse just for saying that!
- version30
Currently I am in KS where the school system takes this shit seriously
religion has been used for centuries to control the people of this planet
to use some idotic "ID" theory in educating our children is a hinderance to the development of human beings
evolution exists, let it be.
at least guinness knows what's up http://www.framestore-cfc.com/pr…
- discipler0
no, that's exactly the point, ribit. Irreducible Complexity and the digital code in DNA show precisely that the only natural mechanism proposed (Natural Selection) is incapable of doing this. Irreducibly Complex machines require all of their parts at once to function. Remove one component and they fail. Natural selection would prevent irreducibly complex machines. And these machines are the core of organic life.
- discipler0
at this point, we are just replaying the last ID thread over and over again. You should probably just refer to what's already been said there.
- pavlovs_dog0
Irreducible Complexity is bullshit.
- pavlovs_dog0
I win.
- version30
man doesn't understand natures complexity, so it must be god?
SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!
- discipler0
- out.
- kyl30
Of mice and manpurses.
- ribit0
no, that's exactly the point, ribit. Irreducible Complexity and the digital code in DNA show precisely that the only natural mechanism proposed (Natural Selection) is incapable of doing this. (etc)
No. I dont agree with this. This is just your theory.
- mikotondria20
And I'll send you my finest pair of stilleto tennis shoes..
Remember -
'This fall: keep it real, wear a heel'
and other related worthless, ass-faced marketing soundbyte tripe headlines that you see on the front of magazines..
Whats with those vibrating razors, too ? Ive got one and Im still too lazy to shave.
And airline food, eh ? Whats up with that ?
Lincoln, Kennedy, secretary, etc..
- ukit0
An insect remains an insect, even if it has an apendage which adapts to it's environment. You have no jump in genome.
-discipler
Do you even understand what a species is?
- TheTick0
Ah, Tick has bought into the lies and propaganda. And still is avoiding the science.
discipler
----------------------------
Dude, I argued with you for six months now. I know the science cold. You're a joke. From now on my #1 job is to just inject the religious nature of what you do and add humorous commentary and asides to your arguments. That's all you'll get from me.Others here do a better job of arguing the science than I do.
To this day people have put you to task certain key questions that you have pussy footed around. Why? Becuase you're not credible. You set up straw men and knock them down. You're entire argument is based on a lie - "Evolution theory is controversial in the scientific community."
It's not.
You build you're entire argument on a fiction.
- ukit0
Species:
"Groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups"