Kids learning web design
- Started
- Last post
- 25 Responses
- e-pill0
..your theme music sir
- scarabin0
i hope they get worse. then i can charge more
- pr20
"Worse even, it was just devoid of quality control, self awareness, basic design principles, etc."
You can apply this quote with slight modifications to ANYTHING today.
Remember that unlike us who grew up with some kind of role models and standards - the new generation is growing up with none of that. With all the positives that come from that set-up there is a crap load of negatives: one being they have absolutely no clue what's going on and why what they are doing is utterly worthless. And of course ultimately is it really? The new generation of customers grew up in similar circumstances so they themselves don't know distinction of good and bad. This in turn means that some other standards of quality emerge - the kind of standards we might not be aware of - the standards that might not actually be based on "quality" as that word means very little to those guys.
- they have Skrillex... no role models? pleasemonospaced
- saying they don't have roll models doesn't say much about us.moldero
- newuser0
Is it a good school? Probably the teacher isn't that great a designer either.
But I think if you go to any undergrad program at any of the top schools, you find clueless students and even teachers.
Art schools have 100's of graduates a year and most of the students have an interest in art but were never pushed hard enough or were in the wrong program or were lazy or clueless.
How many people graduate from Harvard each year and what percentage actually are successful though?
- Devrymg33
- There you go. What good designer would teach there?newuser
- oh man...ohhhhhsnap
- newuser0
Are your friends parents into design?
You can't expect a design program to teach a student. They can only guide and shape natural skills and interests.
- studderine0
Tl;dr?
- ohhhhhsnap0
FFS (< i learned this from monospaced)
Help him!
- if you don't he will end up here http://www.logoworks…ohhhhhsnap
- monNom0
Maybe this kid just doesn't have the proper foundation to succeed?
Did he demonstrate abilities in art? science? technology? mechanics?
You can't just drop someone who can't draw, has trouble with computers, and couldn't figure out a mechanical problem if their life depended on it into a course and make them a web designer. (though schools will totally sign them up!). Some people just aren't cut out for it, and those that are probably practiced like crazy their whole life 'cause that's what was fun for them.The sad thing is, schools take credit for all that prior learning of successful grads, and claim they can teach it to you in 2 years. But really, they've just got some textbooks and some people to ask questions to. If you don't know what's important, 'cause you've never seen ANY of it, you'll take away far less than the person who came in well primed. and can fit the more interesting stuff into a well-honed mental framework.
- cannonball19780
Honestly, design principles aren't something you just pick up. You refine them your entire life, grasshopper. I didn't learn how important they were for a long time, and certainly didn't in college when painting color wheels.
- PS, help him discover them. Grumpy old man designer advice didn't work when prescribed to me.cannonball1978
- agreed. teach him mg33, schools are mostly about that $$ anyway.ohhhhhsnap
- Irafis0
This "new" generation is made mostly of Photoshoppers, not designers.
- animatedgif0
It's not just design it's most universities.
Majority of them will let absolutely anyone on to any course as long as you can pay. The only difference with design is that you can decide if a student is terrible by glancing at their work for a second where most others would require you to read a few pages of a dissertation.
Although I think print design and illustration courses might be a bit more stricter than most web design courses as it's such an early medium that a lot of people teaching it don't know what the fuck they're doing.
"This "new" generation is made mostly of Photoshoppers, not designers."
The Photoshoppers are the ones who didn't even go to school for any sort of design and just learnt everything from tutorials/trends. Basically the entirety of Dribbble and anyone who has ever used the term "flat design" seriously.
- animatedgif0
e.g shit like this:
"Better put some circles on it and mention the Golden Ratio so people know it's legit and because I just read this article http://www.macrumors.com/2011/06… "
- golden ratio, dan brown, sigh ...Weyland
- all bullshitdoesnotexist
- it's not ALL bullshit, I like the ratio when dividing a page, but some people take it way too farmonospaced
- doesnotexist0
you probably notice it more because of the abyss of time that has passed since school.
- monospaced0
It's because no talent cunts are teaching instead of practicing.
- inteliboy0
We're hiring for a junior position at the moment and I've been blown away with how shit or average they all have been...
I seriously thought kids these days (and I'm talking early 20's kids), growing up with the internet, adobe suite installed, epic tutorials, countless hours on inspiration blogs.... NO. no. The amount of rubbish applicants is staggering.
You can't teach talent, and growing up with the tools certainly doesn't seem to be creating talent either. And there was a time I thought "shit son, all these kids are going to wipe us away and take our jobs"
- monospaced0
It's because their no talent cunt teachers couldn't hack it in the real world.