Logo Feedback
- Started
- Last post
- 50 Responses
- moldero0
go here: http://www.qbn.com/topics/573371…
here maybe: http://www.google.com.mx/images?…notice the simplicity. the difference between a logo and a shitty graphic is logos are meant to be easily identified and remembered by just a glance. too much detail and your logo becomes just a shitty graphic. get out of photoshop, get into illustrator, get out a paper and a pen start jotting down ideas. ex: you got a map, drop the map but pull things from it to use as your logo, maps have a lot of elements, legends, compases n shit, modify a font so the first character slightly matches one of these elements maybe. come up with 10 or 20 of these then take it from there
- attentionspan0
- nice keming74LEO
- better alreadydoesnotexist
- WINNER!utopian
- WINNING!dbloc
- no. if they make it past the miss spelling. that comma is sure to mess them up. Also no personality.monNom
- 74LEO0
Sorry think of this every time someone says they are from Austria.
- odds0
- exact.doesnotexist
- app icon != logopauliusuza
- a logo doesn't have to work as an app icon...thiten
- odds0
this you too?
http://www.travl.at/
looks shit as well
- dMullins0
I think the first one was better. Personally, I would recommend reverting to the first one and doing the following:
- make the map a bit smaller so it doesn't compete with the logotype for proper hierarchy (you'd rather have people read the company/site name than looking at the map)
- reduce the colors in the map graphic
- lose the bevel on the type
- lose the gradient on the type