Is 1280px too wide?
- Started
- Last post
- 13 Responses
- CuriousGeorge
for a design site? or any other site for that matter.
- Ruffian0
960 would be better.
- toe_knee0
yes. unless you are designing purely for people with big monitors
960-70 is probably ideal
- toe_knee0
*remembers when we had to design sites that were 600px wide
- hotroddy0
1024x768 has 17% market share according to my blog analytics.
- Seanbot0
Yes. That is alot eye scanning.
- mydo0
*remembers when we had to design sites using a pen knife and graph paper
- set0
Yes.
- bigtrickagain0
not if your site is an ad for widescreen monitors.
- i realize now that this statement as phrased is ambiguous and makes little sense. i apologize.bigtrickagain
- stewdio0
I'm in the early phases of rebuilding Stewdio. I'm having a big change of heart from using smaller components that float on a grid to using a larger more structured layout. The new "comfortable" width will be 1080 pixels and change. Easy to do for myself. Probably not the right thing for a client serving a wider array of visitors.
- bigtrickagain0
build your site in two sizes and use javascript to load one or the other depending on window size?
- M_C_P0
never too wide for the pornoz sites
- yeah, but porno sites always create a giant load.iCanHasQBN
- your play on words is only bested by your play on yourself?M_C_P
- zzzingbigtrickagain
- Iggyboo0
Unlike creative folk most people reduce their monitor screen sizes of their browsers so they can hide the screens at work or just because their not visual people. That being said I think we have to stick to 960, and now because of the iphone and ipad even more so than before. Let it be for now it is standard.
- Damn these phones for dumbing everything else down to 1996.CyBrain
- utopian0
975 pixels, maximum width I would recommend...
http://www.w3schools.com/browser…