logo crit
- Started
- Last post
- 28 Responses
- flint
your fav please
what can i do better?
stw are the initials and must be used
thanks alot
- stewart0
1, or 4, but stw is too small
- ********0
1
- ********0
just highjacking your thread here, does anyone feel like designing me a logo? very basic, i have made refrence thingies just cant seem to think/decide/do today.
dont all reply at once now!
- surecactushands
- fo real?********
- fucking around > workcactushands
- cactushands0
1 is too motorcross looking for me, same with 2
i'd work on number 3. i think it's strongest one- i agree - it's the most "engineering/compone... one of the 5hans_glib
- ********0
1. 4. Both could do with some colour, like it.
- flint0
thanks a lot
- HomeCreative0
1, but could do with a space between chiptuning
- inteliboy0
1 or 3
though 3 mark looks like a bug.
- utopian0
#4,
*Don't listen to the rubber necks above... they spend to much time trolling the "Chick of the Day" thread.
- rascuache0
I like #4, but why is the "W" picked out, what's the significance there?
- aanderton0
3 Wins it in my opinion.
- monospaced0
Good choices here. I am gravitating toward 3 and 4. My only problem is that the type treatment already feels a little dated.
- flint0
i will work on 3. (round edges?)
make the colours of 1. (red, black, white, with space between)...
thanks a lot- bring the chip down a bit more then show with rounded and unrounded cornerscactushands
- pascii0
1/3
- bored2death0
I like 3. There's something interesting about the way you cropped the chip. Looks almost bug like. I think the STW could be more legible. The "T" gets lost to me. The Registered mark is up too high and seems large in comparison to "chiptuning".
But these are just aesthetic critiques... I'm not even sure what this is for so I have no idea how successful it is as a logo.
- flint0
the company software-optimises the enginecontroler chip in cars
20 hp more or efficienter and fewer toxicthanks for comment
- Projectile0
aah ok now I get the whole f1/motorcross look. in that case 4. but thicken up that stroke around the stw.. it disappears when small
- flint0
special thanks to (bored2death, cactushands)
think i show v1 or v3
- 33333333333333333333...cactushands
- Looks like clip art...utopian
- d_rek0
flint,
I think the STW needs some refinment. The first vertical stroke of the W appears to have an angle that is perceptible viewing at full-size.
The icon itself also needs some work. The shape that is being made from the crop in the top right corner feels a bit out of place while the bottom left feels a little clunky and uneven because of the slight inward-angle.
The tweaking you're doing to the letterforms does not feel all that appropriate to me either. Perhaps you could take some characteristics of the icon (ie: pinched caps, reverse rounded out corners) and apply them to the STW as opposed to using what appear to be trivial stylistic tendencies. Think of a specific quality you want the letterforms to communicate. Also, the middle of the S is a bit thin. Optically you may want to keep it slightly thinner but since you appear to be trying to maintain some level of consistency throughout the STW you may want to consider beefing it up.
And lastly the chiptuning all but gets lost at a small size. Perhaps making the weight a bit more significant would help legibility.
- monospaced0
maybe try two or three fewer "prongs" coming out of the chip (simplify) and make the mark the same height as STW