New W3C site
- Started
- Last post
- 16 Responses
- 303
works nice in different screen resolutions;
- mikotondria30
...and good with images off too :)
- and I think you missed an '-ly' off nice, there sir.mikotondria3
- Geith0
Weird design, but I suppose its functionally and webomatically correct.
- MrDinky0
gradients and dropshadows. Pillars of design
- trooperbill0
lol its ok, the entire w3c just needs to be more engaging rather than letting blogs like smashing magazine etc do all the work for them
- shitehawke0
Its all a bit massive, isn't it?
- 3030
It looks massive when you have big screen. The layout is based on fluid grid.
- So you're saying that it doesn't work well in different screen resolutions?shitehawke
- I didn't say that. I said that it looks bigger on higher resolutions303
- this is why i dont like liquid layouts.Stugoo
- whitespace is not W3c compliant.Frosty_spl
- d_rek0
Uhg... you would think that such a definitive resource like the W3C could at least move their ass into the 21st century as far as design is concerned.
This looks worse than the original design.
- Stugoo0
i quite like it, far better than it was before.
- Frosty_spl0
I saw Molly Holschag speak last month. She is a freakin nutcase who thinks flash will die and some opensource fairydust HTML5 tags will take its place.
- calculator0
all sites should work and look like this?
- 3030
I am digging through the source code and can't understand, why they didn't make clear reference to jQuery that has been used on the website. You can view it once you find the main JS file
http://www.w3.org/2008/site/js/m…Then it is clear that they use jQuery.
- BIGGESTDOGINTHEWORLD0
_
looks like one of those fake spam blogs you run into when you mistype domains, in other words too generic