QBN Ratio
- Started
- Last post
- 62 Responses
- calcium
I may or may not be contributing to the mindless shit that has been going on here lately. But I can't take an honest break from work without seeing more than half the threads on the homepage have zero brain activity in them. I'm tired of getting tricked into clicking on threads that sound interesting only to find an image of a squirrel and a dog touching uglies.
I propose that QBN sets up a ratio system. Much like the torrent clubs. Pertinent : Mindless. If your mindless posts/threads exceeds your pertinent, you are booted, IP banned, whatever.
There is no law!
Idiots, insert your 4chan photos below.
- Mau0
AMEN
- gung_hoek0
ALLAH U AKHBAR
- sigg0
DOUBLE AMEN!
- MrDinky0
I am proud of you.
- brandelec0
i agree
- baseline_shift0
Ban this fucker!
- utopian0
I feel whole again...
- calcium0
Also, I am all for a funny video, or a laugh from time to time. But I can't bring myself to click anything that doesn't explicitly indicate it is design related or else I may see a video of someone dying or a dude dressed like a dog.
- MrDinky0
Maybe we should calculate the actualization probability of this system and maintenance of such in duration set to measure the effectiveness along with efficiency ratio.
- PonyBoy0
nobody makes you click into any particular thread... do they?
I could understand complaining about something only if it were
A.) Yours in the first place...
B.) You paid to use it...
C.) You were being forced to do it...- I wish I could have it my way. Because then I wouldn't have seen your username nor read your rant.calcium
- I wish I could hand you a box of kleenex and make it all betterPonyBoy
- shut your mouth. i'd LOVE to be able to surf QBN with images on but fuck me, that's just not possible...sigg
- because in every thread the typical a-holes have to post something NSFW trying to be funny/clever.sigg
- designbot0
Sometimes the random posts can be okay and interesting. But it annoys the piss out of me when it's the same people posting pointless things one after the other. I agree there needs to be a healthy balance.
- MrDinky0
FRatioDistribution["n", "m"]
mean | m/(m-2) for m>2
standard deviation | (sqrt(2) m sqrt(m+n-2))/(sqrt(m-4) (m-2) sqrt(n)) for m>4
variance | (2 m^2 (m+n-2))/((m-4) (m-2)^2 n) for m>4
skewness | (2 sqrt(2) sqrt(m-4) (m+2 n-2))/((m-6) sqrt(n) sqrt(m+n-2)) for m>6
kurtosis | (12 ((m-4) (m-2)^2+(5 m-22) n (m+n-2)))/((m-8) (m-6) n (m+n-2))+3 for m>8ean | m/(m-2) for m>2
standard deviation | (sqrt(2) m sqrt(m+n-2))/(sqrt(m-4) (m-2) sqrt(n)) for m>4
variance | (2 m^2 (m+n-2))/((m-4) (m-2)^2 n) for m>4
skewness | (2 sqrt(2) sqrt(m-4) (m+2 n-2))/((m-6) sqrt(n) sqrt(m+n-2)) for m>6
kurtosis | (12 ((m-4) (m-2)^2+(5 m-22) n (m+n-2)))/((m-8) (m-6) n (m+n-2))+3 for m>8(m^(m/2) n^(n/2) x^(-1 + n/2) (m + n x)^((-m - n)/2))/Beta[n/2, m/2]
with/or
PDF[FRatioDistribution[n, m], x]{FRatioDistribution[2, 3], FRatioDistribution[3, 2]}
BetaRegularized[(n x)/(m + n x), n/2, m/2] / CDF[FRatioDistribution[n, m], x] / I_((n x)/(m+n x))(n/2,m/2)
{FRatioDistribution[2, 3], FRatioDistribution[3, 2]}
- you left out the box of kleenex for all the internet tearsPonyBoy
- brandelec0
some users should have god mode
- thanksJnr_Madison
- use | to bring down the console, then type /Godinvo
- LoldMullins
- sikma0
QBN appears happy to have their "brand" turn into garbage
- brandelec0
^ true... just take a look at that PV... sad site
- TheBlueOne0
*send link to squirrel and dog bumping uglies. can't seem to locate