logo crit
- Started
- Last post
- 38 Responses
- brains0
I like #3, but I'm not sure how it would function as a logo per se. I could also, almost do without the tree trunk. I like the leaves grouped the way they are.. I'm not sure though...
- ********0
- marchelo0
I like #1 But #3 has the most impact, good color combination, I agree with the others about not liking it going through the "o" It looks very unbalanced. There's a lot of potential in promoting with only the logomark as well. Good job.
- Perhaps try a stand alone logotype and also a mark?marchelo
- MrOneHundred0
Number 3. Save it, send it, invoice it. Tell them this is the logo - amy arguments and there will be blood.
- LOL! i love this. can i hire you to do this for my clients? :)leftwave
- TResudek0
The Tree in #3 is great but I'm not sold on the type.
- Iggyboo0
Their quite unique but the type readability size on 3 is a mess and #1 is a bit winter and seasonal. I'd suggest #3 but redoing the type layout.
- ********0
I'd agree with the consensus on 3. It's cute and playful.
Options wise, I'd lose one altogether and with 2, it looks rather clumsy, if you had to do something with it, I'd lose the somewhat forced link with the L and the leaf and just position the leaf somewhere else.
- plash0
numeral 2wo and numeral 3hree are my votes;
you have a story book element in these logos. nice job.
- peddy28isgreat0
#2
- ********0
I like 3. Its the most memorable in my opinion, and it would look good on the tags or labels.. dont you agree?
1 looks like a book title and 2 looks like a blog header. Theyre good but thats what they look like.
3 looks like accessory labeling in my opinion
- ********0
be carefull for small size print
- Amicus0
You could use all the variations plus one for smaller use with slightly bigger "in the" text. I like the idea of having multiple variations on the same theme. I think this is unique enough to work for you and enhances the playfulness.
Nice!
- rubiksquare0
combine #1 and #3 ideas together.
- Nairn0
I'm with Horton - I'd kind of expect breadcrumbs or a Red Riding Hood style cape'n'hat or something. Conceptually, the first option is the one that rings truest, but it's too dark and foreboding and entirely unsuitable for purpose.
Have to say that I prefer Brains' amendments to 3 - I was left wondering why there was a focus on the O, whereas the focus on 'in the' makes a lot more sense. Though, I prefer the version without the stem, as the jumble somehow says 'lost' to me, where it doesn't otherwise.
wer, these are some really decent concepts, leftwave - good job!
- johndiggity0
lost in the woods? let me see some owl eyes in the double o's!
- coco_ono0
THREE
- kgvs720
#3
