rockstar, jock, or actor
- Started
- Last post
- 15 Responses
- ********
which would you rather be?
- ********0
Jock seems to be the most pay for the least amount of on-the-job work. No?
- Jaline0
- busted?********
- this topic deserves more scrutiny********
- busted?
- ********0
the problem with being a jock is you have to train all year round
- ********0
oh, or corporate executive?
- ukit0
Probably rockstar, because I like music
- nadanada0
mmm corporate executive.
'BRING ME A GODDAMN LATTE BEFORE I DISEMBOWEL YOU WITH MY DESK ACCESSORIES.'
- ********0
I vote rockstar. no need for plastic surgery and old jocks are pathetic.
- ********0
I've been thinking about this and I think I'd still go with rockstar. I'd be afraid of being a one-hit wonder though. Actors probably have a longer fame lifetime.
- coco_ono0
rockstar
- scarabin_net0
old rock stars are pretty pathetic, too
- scarabin_net0
i'd go with rockstar though, the parties are better
- OSFA0
QBN Moderator!
- ********0
I was on a date once at an ethiopian restaurant in chicago and my date said "oh my god, I think that's eddie rabbit, don't look". So I didn't look. I still don't know who eddie rabbit is.
- bulletfactory0
rockstar. then you're free to do whatever. actors and athletes don't typically have this luxury.
many musicians also 'act' and compete in sports (albeit not contact sports, but sports nonetheless).
Pro athletes pass their prime at a very young age - then have to become commentators, coaches, etc.
actors who try music professionally walk a fine line of becoming a joke.