russian predicts US collapse..

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 67 Responses
  • Thompy0

    Aye lets all listen to esteemed Prof. Igor

  • SigDesign0

    Well first... It is true that the U.S. will lose some of its regulatory standing to countries like China. But, Russia is another story... as it is depending so much on oil exports and controlling reserves in that area of the world.

    Also, China is already suffering from countless problems, and despite the wealthy elite, there are many more millions living in poverty than in the U.S.

    As far as the splitting of our country into different sections... his reasoning shows a general lack of understanding of our politics at the local level. Perhaps he's talking about what could happen, say, 60 years from now?

    • Yeah fuck it we could all be dead by then, right?Horp
    • haha, really... I mean, there's only so much we can do to help that right?SigDesign
  • mg330

    And on the other hand, you have Bush trying to do something right and just make it all go away:

    Bush To Cut Deficit From Federal Budget

    WASHINGTON, DC—President Bush proposed a $2.4 trillion election-year budget Monday that would boost defense spending, redistribute funds among government programs, and cross out the $477 billion deficit entirely.

    "Nobody likes making cuts, but the nation's current rate of spending and the decreased tax revenues we've seen since implementing my tax cuts have created a deficit that we can't afford to carry," Bush said in a nationally televised address. "Someone had to have the vision, leadership, and courage to go in and erase that line altogether, no matter how unpopular and impossible that may be."

    According to the Congressional Budget Office, the $477 billion deficit is the country's largest ever, easily topping the previous record of $290 billion in 1992. If the budget is approved, however, the deficit will roll down to $0.0 billion.

    In the past, critics have accused the Bush Administration of responding to a mounting deficit and the ongoing recession with unsound fiscal policies like cutting taxes for the wealthy. Bush supporters say the deficit cut proves the wisdom of the president's economic plan.

    "Bush has taken a brave step, one that was long overdue," Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) said. "He has taken charge of the budget problem once and for all, simply by saying 'The deficit stops here.'"

    Faced with the difficult choice of either cutting government programs or raising taxes, Bush reportedly arrived at the radical new "deficit-cutting" solution late Sunday night, only hours before he was to announce his budget.

    "I was staring at the figure for the deficit, and I decided that it simply could not stand," Bush said. "It was too high. Something had to be done. But Americans have been taxed and taxed. I say 'Enough taxes.' By my estimation, this historical crossing-out of the deficit will save American taxpayers millions, billions, and perhaps even bajillions of dollars."

    The president then turned to Section 14-D of the official budget document, where the federal government's total expenditures, the GNP, and the difference between the two were listed. Using a black Sharpie, the president crossed out the third figure, eliminating it entirely.

    Bush then held up the newly marked-up page and said, "My fellow Americans, I have solved the federal budget crisis."

    The budget is expected to pass through the GOP-controlled Congress with little or no opposition.

    "I don't know why I didn't have this idea before," Bush said. "For years, we have tried to control the deficit by eliminating federal programs, lowering taxes for the rich, sending out checks to everybody, and God knows what else. None of us once thought to just draw a line through it."

    The Bush plan is not without critics.

    "President Bush drew a line through the deficit, yes, and we commend him for that," Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) said. "But that doesn't solve the country's budgetary problems. While he was at it, why didn't he add several zeroes to the end of our GNP?"

    Political pundits have been largely impressed by the visionary slash.

    "Opinions vary as to what the long-term effects of the deficit cut will be," New York Times columnist Paul Krugman said. "One thing, however, is certain: The growing federal deficit, a Gordian knot that for three years no amount of cutting taxes and spending money could unravel, has been sliced in two by the president's bold, radical new take on the problem."

    A CNN/Gallup poll taken immediately after the president's announcement showed that 67 percent of Americans support his decision to draw a black line through the deficit, and thereby eliminate it.

    "I'm tired of the tax-and-spend Democrats always talking about adding zeroes to the GNP," said Henry Strom, 40, of Bakersfield, CA. "How about we cross out our debts and get our affairs in order before we start adding zeroes? We need to cut this deficit and stand firm against printing deficits in future budgets, as well."

    According to Bush's political advisors, later this week, the president will declare that the U.S. has universal health care.

  • designbot0

    I have to assume this guy, being Russian, has a certain amount of bias towards the US. This is probably his wish more than it is a reality.

    I could see the US merging with other nations before breaking apart like he predicts.

    Then he says Russia along with China will replace the U.S. in regulating world markets...what a douchebag. China maybe, but Russia....don't think so. Then he suggests "we could claim Alaska - it was only granted on lease, after all." ahahha.

  • Nairn0

    Maybe yes, maybe no - who can truly say?

    I would point out that his perspective is from that of a country which did fall apart, but which was a much younger forced union.

    • and from all reports looks like it's coming back together again. *cough GeorgiaJazX
  • JazX0

    take your pick

  • Horp0

    This also means that John Titor may actually have been a genuine time travellor.

    • We call them "travellors" in the time-travel industry. "Travellers" seems so 19th century.Horp
    • HAHHAHAA!JazX
  • exador1

    good lord, it's a feeding frenzy of doom...
    i'll just put this one in the 'crazy but scary' file...

    http://www.drudgereport.com/flas…

    what do you good folks think....sounds like a lot of rubbish to me, but still...kind of creepy considering the news lately...