Hillary Clinton

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 106 Responses
  • DaveO-1

    Would people prefer Trump over her?

    • That's like asking if you'd rather die by firing squad or electrocution?drake-von-drake
    • Yes.
      |=|>2K16
      ORAZAL
    • Important question though...DaveO
    • nocbass99
    • No, I think Hillary has already won.
      But we can all run our mouths off until November.
      ORAZAL
    • Delegate count is Bernie 980, Hillary 1,243. And we are just half way done with many upcoming states in Bernie's favor. Don't be so shortsighted.iCanHazQBN
    • potentially, according to Judge Napolitano, the FBI has a mountain of evidence against her. I'll wait to see.drake-von-drake
    • Actually, if Hillary is Indicted, Obama could be witness in the case.drake-von-drake
    • Clinton committed a "criminal act" by paying someone to move emails from the government's servers to a private one at her house.drake-von-drake
    • "Guess who many of them were sent to and from. The president himself. If the president decides the Justice Department is free to indict her, he may very well bedrake-von-drake
    • a witness in the case."drake-von-drake
    • @iCanHazQBN I completely agree and could stomach Sanders. Additionally, let's see how this case turns out. Could drag her through the mud to BS's favordrake-von-drake
    • Sanders V Trump though?DaveO
    • Sanders then. But Hillary still.ORAZAL
    • I guess I just meant that Sanders will most likely lose to Trump, Clinton would attract more moderate Repulicans I'm sure. What;s really funny is speaking to...DaveO
    • ...Republicans and listening to them trying to get used to the idea that they'll have to get behind trump of he's nominated.DaveO
    • What the hell is the King of Von Trolls yapping about now?Drumpf
    • ^ you nuts?yurimon
    • Trump & WW3 over that shady cunt Hillary!moldero
    • "move emails from the government's servers to a private one at her house" is this really a big deal considering there are copies on the gov servers still?monospaced
    • It is a big deal mono. This info was only supposed to be seen from secure terminals. Even the agents in the investigation don't have clearance to see the info.IRNlun6
    • gotcha, so now everyone sees and what.. .there's proof of her being a criminal or not? Or is it just the emails being out by her? Or is it wikileaks?monospaced
    • It has to be assumed that the data has been compromised. The data being on those servers is a crime.IRNlun6
    • It's a shame only conservatives are reporting on this. Makes it seem political when it really is a massive security breach.IRNlun6
    • Well yeah it was compromised, you can download a bunch from wikileaks. Unfortunately none of it seems meaningful.monospaced
    • It's presumed that there's special access program level data thats not to be released to the public. I read a really good article on this I'm trying to find...IRNlun6
    • Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III sent a letter to congress saying there's high level intelligence.IRNlun6
    • But it's become political so everything is in doubt. Although there can't be an ongoing investigation if it's nothing...IRNlun6
    • Since according to you she "moved" the emails to her server, why isn't she in jail and charged with that crime?monospaced
    • and what of the fact that the entire government knowingly emailed with her on a separate email account for several years without mentioning it was an issue?monospaced
    • is the crime that she moved emails, used the wrong email account, or both?monospaced
    • its called political power. plus if she goes down it implicates alot more people around her. she admitted it its serious crime because she initially didnt ryurimon
    • report it till it was found out and couldnt cover it up anymore.yurimon
    • It's not according to me. There's an active investigation regarding these emails, the Intelligence Community Inspector says there is high level intelligence.IRNlun6
    • The suspected crime is having high level intelligence on a private server.IRNlun6
  • ORAZAL1


    12 transgender Americans who are proud to support Hillary Clinton.

    Despite unprecedented visibility for the transgender community in media, popular culture, and politics, the reality remains that many trans people are still subjected to discrimination and violence simply for being who we are.

    The stakes in this election could not be higher for the transgender community. That’s why so many of us joined together last month to launch Trans United for Hillary, a national volunteer effort to educate, engage, and mobilize the trans community and our allies in support of Hillary Clinton. Hillary has a record of results for the trans community and has outlined the most detailed plan for trans equality ever proposed by a presidential candidate. She’s called violence against transgender people—particularly trans women of color—a “national crisis,” made passage of the Equality Act one of her highest priorities, and affirmed the humanity and dignity of trans lives.
    https://www.hillaryclinton.com/f…

  • drake-von-drake-1
  • drake-von-drake-1

  • drake-von-drake0

    • and now she views differently, unlike the right, who still thinks gays are going to hell for their choice of a sinful lifemonospaced
    • I don't think all of the right thinks that and your generalizations make you look somewhat silly. I think Cruz and Carson do, but Trump, Kasich and Rubio don't.drake-von-drake
    • The Republican party along with the Democratic party are going to implode, you are seeing the beginnings of it now with Sanders and Trump.drake-von-drake
    • you're missing my point, which is that she changed her views, unlike the right which, GENERALLY, has not (just look at what they're doing in states, holy shit)monospaced
    • Fucking DrakeRamanisky2
    • "your generalizations make you look somewhat silly"
      *posts picture of Hillary as nazi*

      Well done, mate.
      face_melter
    • did this guy post something about what she said.... 16 years ago? lmaoCygnusZero4
    • yes, she's a waffling cuntdrake-von-drake
    • almost the entire population of the western world changed their views on this subject in those same 16 yearsmonospaced
  • ORAZAL-2

    Hillary Clinton’s Long Road to Supporting Gay Marriage
    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/20…

    • "I believe marriage is a sacred bound, between a man and a women." I didn't hear anything about gay marriage support whatsoever, actually, that's total BS.drake-von-drake
    • Did you even listen to it? She is mumbling and obviously struggling. She sounds like Trump. WTF!?drake-von-drake
    • Yes, I did listen to it and read the article. I am acknowledging what she said, not denying it or justifying it.ORAZAL
    • that video, by no means, suggests she was supporting gay marriage in 2004. If she had, I would give her credit, but she did not. Instead pandering to blackdrake-von-drake
    • churches for their vote and they are NOTORIOUSLY against gays.drake-von-drake
    • “If you can’t understand it without an explanation, you can’t understand it with an explanation”ORAZAL
    • She is babbling and struggling. It's a crock of shit to use that as a means for gay marriage support. You know it and I know it.drake-von-drake
    • Who is using it as a means for gay support? Make an effort and focus.ORAZAL
    • Just because I support Hillary doesn't mean I support all her history. I am confirming what you said and that is what seems to be bothering you.ORAZAL
    • Sorry to dissapoint you.ORAZAL
    • you do realize she's addressed this several times in recent years, and has admitted to having a changed view... holy shit even I had shifting views in that timemonospaced
    • I can accept that, but don't act like she's been on board for the longest time. She is a fucking "centrist", who IMO leans more right now. I call total BS.drake-von-drake
    • "but don't act like she's been on board for the longest time"
      You still haven't gotten it have you?
      I thought libertarians were all about reason & logic.
      ORAZAL
    • Not with her. She proven what a BSer she is through time. Dirty as fuck. Cannot stand her. GO BERNIE!drake-von-drake
    • So you are saying you are ok with the "waffling" then? Fuck, the Republicans are right wing crackjobs, but at least they have integrity of beliefs.drake-von-drake
    • BTW, maybe I misunderstood your title. I thought you were implying her "long road to supporting gay marriage" was documented in that video.drake-von-drake
    • Not "waffling" but "flopping".
      Bravo boy! That only took us 15 notes.
      hashtag sarcasm
      ORAZAL
    • Oh come on... haha your title was very misleading in connection with the video FFS :-)drake-von-drake
    • I guess you didn't the article :-)ORAZAL
    • You're a fun guy!ORAZAL
    • Now that you have the full picture go back and read the notes. It's all the there in the first note I made (third one from the top).ORAZAL
    • Dude, go back to what I said about these fuckers wetting their fingers, putting it into the air and seeing which way the wind blows. Doesn't make her specialdrake-von-drake
    • http://i3.mirror.co.…terry_cloth
  • ORAZAL-2

    Hillary Clinton’s changing position on same-sex marriage
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-…

    • TOO FUCKING LATE. Yeah, of course she will now. Wets her finger, puts it in the air and say, "OH OK.. now I should say this" Get the fuck out of here man.drake-von-drake
    • Classless CUNTdrake-von-drake
    • The only one that is pushing for what he/she believes is Bernie, all the rest are just rambling what they think will get them elected, no one is debating thatformed
    • but like is often the case, she's the far lesser of the evils and will be the next President, like it or notformed
    • ^ exactly. I would agree with that. Bernie is the only one with something new to say. Trump is somewhat secondary to that, but as least he's not BOUGHTdrake-von-drake
    • All this "trump can't be bought" shit. Trump doesn't need to be bought.moldero
    • Trump can't be bought because his only interest is himself and he can feed that at the expense of everyone, everything, elseformed
    • he can't be bought because he sold out years and years ago, nothing left on the shelvesmonospaced
    • #whichhillarymoldero
  • drake-von-drake-5

    Oops, you lost again Hillary. The joke is on the democrats. You're being SCAMMED, watch the delegate and superdelegate fiasco unroll. Sanders voters, I feel sorry for you. The momentum is with Bernie.

  • drake-von-drake-1

    Obama and Clinton Supported and Enabled Tax Evasion Revealed By the “Panama Papers” / Sanders did not
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/20…

    Barack Obama pushed the trade deal with Panama which allowed the tax evasion revealed by the "Panama Papers" to flourish. Huffington Post reported in 2011:

    Obama is also urging Congress to approve a trade agreement that would cement a key tax avoidance tactic deployed by some of the richest Americans.

    ***

    Obama urged Congress approve three trade deals, including one with Panama that would permit Americans to easily stash assets in the Central American country, a notorious tax haven for the wealthy and American corporations.

    ***
    Panama does have some of the most stringent bank secrecy laws in the world, making it extremely easy and inexpensive for U.S. citizens to set up offshore corporations and bank accounts. Establishing the corporation and bank account costs less than $2,000, and any money that Americans stash in these entities is not taxed. Bank secrecy laws and extremely lax corporate registration standards make it very difficult for the Internal Revenue Service to track transactions transferring funds to these Panamanian destinations from the United States. Small surprise, then, that Panama is home to nearly 400,000 offshore corporations, more than any other nation except Hong Kong.

    ***

    The trade agreement with Panama would effectively bar the U.S. from cracking down on this activity. The U.S. would not be allowed to treat Panamanian financial services transactions differently from transactions in nations that are not tax havens. It would also be unable to pursue some standard anti-money laundering techniques in Panama. Combating tax haven abuse in Panama would be a violation of the trade agreement, exposing the U.S. to fines from international authorities.

    “It directly undermines Obama’s putative domestic agenda of job creation, cracking down on tax havens and collecting revenue from tax-dodging corporations,” said Lori Wallach, Director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch. “The [free trade agreement] would forbid future use of existing policy tools to combat financial crime.”
    Hillary Clinton did as well ...

    International Business Times reports:

    Soon after taking office in 2009, Obama and his secretary of state [Hillary Clinton] — who is currently the Democratic presidential front-runner — began pushing for the passage of stalled free trade agreements (FTAs) with Panama, Colombia and South Korea that opponents said would make it more difficult to crack down on Panama’s very low income tax rate, banking secrecy laws and history of noncooperation with foreign partners.

    ***

    Upon Congress ratifying the pact, Clinton issued a statement lauding the agreement, saying it ... "will make it easier for American companies to sell their products." She added: "The Obama administration is constantly working to deepen our economic engagement throughout the world, and these agreements are an example of that commitment."
    But Bernie Sanders opposed the tax evasion deal with Panama, and prophetically warned in 2011:

    Panama’s entire annual economic output is only $26.7 billion a year, or about two-tenths of 1 percent of the U.S. economy. No one can legitimately make the claim that approving this free trade agreement will significantly increase American jobs. Then, why would we be considering a stand-alone free trade agreement with Panama, tiny little country?

    Well, it turns out that Panama is a world leader when it comes to allowing wealthy Americans and large corporations to evade U.S. taxes by stashing their cash in offshore tax havens. And the Panama free trade agreement will make this bad situation much worse. Each and every year, the wealthiest people in our country and the largest corporations evade about $100 billion in U.S. taxes through abusive and illegal offshore tax havens in Panama and in other countries. So, according to Citizens for Tax Justice—and I quote—"A tax haven ... has one of three characteristics: It has no income tax or a very low-rate income tax; it has bank secrecy laws; and it has a history of non-cooperation with other countries on exchanging information about tax matters. Panama has all three of those. ... They’re probably the worst."

  • drake-von-drake1

    You got it kid!

    • Yuri Von Troll - please spend more time learning how to paint like an elephant and less time trolling QBN.Drumpf
    • nom nomDillinger
  • drake-von-drake0

    OOPS! The gloves come off... and he's riiiiiiiiiiiiiight!

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/06/po…

    "Secretary Clinton appears to be getting a little bit nervous," he told a crowd in Philadelphia.

    "And she has been saying lately that she thinks that I am 'not qualified' to be president. Well, let me, let me just say in response to Secretary Clinton: I don't believe that she is qualified, if she is, through her super PAC, taking tens of millions of dollars in special interest funds. I don't think that you are qualified if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC."

    • Yuri Von Troll - please spend more time learning how to paint like an elephant and less time trolling QBN.Drumpf
  • ORAZAL-5

    We're not here to make enemies, we're here to win.

    • |=|>2K16ORAZAL
    • fiscally you are voting for a candidate like a Bush here, you do know that right? she is going to lose, you watch, momentum is killing her.drake-von-drake
    • unfortunately for the democraps, there is such a thing as competition, not everyone wins or gets a trophy in political races.drake-von-drake
    • Drake and Hillary in a tree, k-i-s-s-i-n-g.face_melter
    • If only! I'd pull out a shiv and watch that bitch falldrake-von-drake
    • Who am I kidding, it would be a revenge / torture fuck!drake-von-drake
    • you would eat her shit, just like the rest of us will be doing soon after this rigged ass bullshit we call an electionmoldero
  • drake-von-drake-3


    Clinton and Obama Pushed the Trade Deal That Made the Panama Papers Scandal Possible
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/clint…

    • Yuri Von Troll - please spend more time learning how to paint like an elephant and less time trolling QBN.Drumpf
  • Drumpf-1

    • Needs more purple, maybe some blackdrake-von-drake
    • hey dummy, it's only now she is supporting gays, throughout her career she was in opposition of "gay marriage." isn't that convenient???drake-von-drake
  • Drumpf3

    • You betcha' she's cunty DINOdrake-von-drake
    • Hillary Clinton, that cock juggling thunder cunt will use the sexism card to address criticism during her presidential run.drake-von-drake
    • ^ mate, at this point in the proceedings everyone has fucked off home and you're shouting to an empty room.face_melter
  • pango-1
  • pango0

  • pango2

  • pango0

  • CygnusZero40

    This nut drake is going to be super mad when she becomes the next president, and im pretty sure she is going to be.

    • Get some values. Clinton is one of the most corrupt politicians the US has ever had.Hayoth
    • To ignore her criminal activity and psychotic lying habit shows you are enable to think for yourself.Hayoth
    • Yeah. Get values already. Values like trump supports. Values that affect women's wherevers and Americas oilmonospaced
    • like what about womens values? can you be more specific. im not sure wherevers and oil is a value...yurimon
    • what values does trump support? be specific.yurimon
    • She's starting to f a d e. . .drake-von-drake