Cure for Cancer?
- Started
- Last post
- 41 Responses
- Affluenza0
"there ain't no money in the cure!" -chris rock
- visualplane_0
*starts smoking too
- ********0
* sparking
- 7point340
this is supposedly a non-traditional homeopathic remedy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ess…
i know someone that takes it and she swears by it
- exador10
not sure who would be giving this procedure to the the patient...would it be doctors?..could you just have a 'home unit' to zap yourself when you wanted a pickmeup?
because whether or not it is a cure, from what i've seen, if you are predisposed to getting cancer (whether from your surroundings, your habits like smoking, or from your genes) there's a chance it'll come back..so.
maybe THAT is the way that the pharma companies would sink there teeth in...maybe it'd be some kind of treatment you'd need, like..once a year or two...and they'd charge a couple grand every time....and before long..most folks would get the treatment...you know..just to be on the safe-side...
and thus, you now have an even bigger cash cow...
at the moment, it's just cancer patients...what if every man woman and child in the country after the age of , well, whatever, had to get a zap every few years at the cost of a grand or so...
thats a LOT of mula
just speculating of course...
but if I was a pharma exec...thats what would be on MY agenda...- damnit!
*extinguishes cigarette.blaw - you were babysitting that smoke if you just now put it out. You should have been done by now.dbloc
- That was number four. I had some catching up to do.blaw
- Seems perfectly reasonable considering the poison they pump into foods and pharmaceuticals.cotton
- Most of us WILL have cancer the things are going.cotton
- damnit!
- ********0
Good luck too him, and us?
- ohhhhhsnap0
- This apple has cancer.********
- it is sour sop. a fruit.ohhhhhsnap
- and it reverses (some say)ohhhhhsnap
- This apple has cancer.
- _niko0
Alcohol causes cancer now? fuck me...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_…
20,000 cancer deaths per year from alcohol in the US alone.
- how old are those ppl?ohhhhhsnap
- 20,000 out of 314,000,000+???
I wouldn't worry too much.Amicus
- dbloc0
everything causes cancer
- _niko1
Nobody really wants to cure cancer, probably need it as a means for population control.
Number of US deaths due to terrorism: 4000 since 1865.
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/…
Number of US deaths due to cancer: 556,902 per year.
http://environment.about.com/od/…
spending on cancer research: $4.9 billion
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopi…spending on NSA program and other counter terrorism measures:
$52.6 bn
http://www.theguardian.com/world…not including the military cost for the "war on terror" which is closer to $5 trillion.
http://nation.time.com/2011/06/2…
And we're spending all this money and worried about a few idiots with pressure cooker bombs(which we still can't stop)
- dconstrukt0
essiac? eeh.... my dad was on it.. didn't work... plus it tastes like shit.
lost my dad to cancer back in 07.
we tried everything.
I nearly emptied out my bank account trying to save him.
the only thing that worked... was a massive 'cocktail' of 25+ supplements a day... + some scorpion venom from cuba... we had it flown in.... non FDA approved.
he went from jaundice and not being able to leave the house, to going back to work, hanging on his friends boat.
but shit was EXPENSIVE.
this new treatment sounds very promising... crossing fingers it works.... or something works.... we're all loosing so many of our loved ones over this....
its very sad...
hope someone comes out with something.
- monolith0
lol at stupid people thinking there is no cure for cancer..
There's a reason why pharmaceutical companies or anyone who makes drugs for cancer is trying to prevent a natural drug that has shown to effectively cure cancer. It has already been shown that it works and many people who managed to take it have reported that their worst types of cancers are disappearing.
The thing is called Dichloroacetic acid (DCA). it cured or significantly slowed down lung, breast and brain cancer cells and left the healthy cells alone. It was tested on Rats inflicted with severe tumors; their cells shrank when they were fed with water supplemented with DCA.
People who have used this (with colon cancer as well) have reported that it works and that their tumors and cancer cells are disappearing.. It's helping but with more investments and combining it with vitamins and other natural things it could completely wipe out cancer (it actually reverts the cancer cells into their healthy form (cures them))
Why nobody wants this is pretty clear..
- if this was such a cure, then why isn't it more widely used or advised?WeLoveNoise
- because people wan to sell selll sell - such a sad, greedy world we live inlessfloor
- This is so ignorant that its insulting.monospaced
- If you know any doctors you would know how stupid it is to say that there is a cure for cancer alreadymonospaced
- If you know a single cancer researcher you would never say something so ignorant to them.monospaced
- And you sound incredibly offensive calling people stupid who are dedicating their lives to curing it.monospaced
- So go fuck off with your pharma conspiracy theory before talking ignorant naive shit like this.monospaced
- it's true that there is no interest in DCA from big pharma but there's no proof it's a cure (there's also no money to prove it) and it has been shown tokingsteven
- it) it has been shown to decrease apoptosis in certain cellskingsteven
- (which is a bad thing)kingsteven
- Hmm. Yes. Because the company that finds a cure for cancer won't make a penny.monoboy
- dconstrukt0
interesting....
how'd you find out about this?
also there's no 1 size cure all for cancer.... each type is slightly different.... and not everyone responds to the same drugs/supplements.
- vaxorcist0
I always thought that a diet of a whole lot more fresh vegetables can of course make a difference....
but.. the NYT seems to disagree...
- moldero0
too bad he will fall on a bullet soon
- BaskerviIle0
One of the worst mistakes that we have made is the architecture we've created to refer to different cancers. We talk about lung-cancer or breast-cancer or colon-caner. We use the form xxxxx-cancer as if cancer is one disease that just randomly chose a specific body part to infect.
All cancers are different, there are types and groups and some are much more treatable than others.
A cancer is just a glitch, a malfunction. The number of times our body generates new cells every day, it's amazing there aren't more errors.
But it's a mistake to refer to them under one catch-all phrase: cancer.Articles like xxxx causes cancer, or xxxxx cures cancer are meaningless. It's a bit like saying "transport kills", well, what kind of transport? A car is different from a bike or a train or a skateboard etc.
There may never be a cure for 'cancer' but there may be a cure for certain cancers. We already have a vaccine for cervical cancer from HPV.
I always see it a bit like bug fixing. You iron out one bug but then there's some other error and you need to go back in the code and fix it etc.
- monospaced-1
acupuncture
- Chinese Herbs. acupuncture doesnt cure cancer. I think the detox process change in body chemistry does,yurimon
- sigh... i was kidding... and those other things you mentioned aren't cures either, obviouslymonospaced