web-based wysiwyg editor
- Started
- Last post
- 23 Responses
- kiselka
Does anyone know of a web-based wysiwyg editor with FTP built int it?
- madirish0
w/ FTP? you sure about that? why not upload over http since you are already talking over that port?
not trying to say your solution is wrong, but seems a bit contrived and 'over designed' on it's face.
- UndoUndo0
Dreamweaver
- UndoUndo0
sorry DW's obviously not web based.
- skt0
DW should have nothing to do with the web full stop.
- ninjasavant0
Yahoo's Geocities has a web bases wizzywig editor. so does google pages or whatever their website thing is called.
- madirish0
what?
- gabriel20
This is my personal favorite:
- version30
*slices tables
*coughs on sawdust
- ETM0
- maximillion_0
DW is great skt, code collapse reduces my migranes
- version30
write code by hand
red wysiwyg bloat is 'tarded
use firebug to troubleshoot if you really need collapsible code
- akoni0
do wordpress if its simple
- Rand0
I code my postcript by hand
- skt0
DW is great skt, code collapse reduces my migranes
maximillion_
(Mar 20 07, 11:25)sciTE works quite well for that too undo.
- madirish0
wtf are you guys talking about? who in the hell uses a web-based wysiwyg to write original code? isn't this entire question aimed at one for a cms, or in any event, at updating/adding content to a site via a web browser?
where does collapsible code come into play here??
- ETM0
I agree... I am confused. I posted a CMS... but I am not sure what the real question here is...
- version30
i think the question is for a web based dreamweaver
which is completely retarded
- madirish0
you do, dude? it sounded like nothing like that to me at all. i heard "web-based wysiwyg editor with FTP built in" which, to me, sounds exactly like Epoz, Kupu or FCK Editor w/ an FTP functionality integrated. now, why this would be desired to live *w/in* the wysiwyg editor is beyond me as it could just be another field w/in the cms.
my other question about this whole soap opera, is why not upload the file(s) (via the cms or web interface) over port 80 and http(s) as you are already int here? the DSL could handle opening up port 21 or 22 i guess and handle it that way, but then there would be security and verification issues that would stem and having the DSL mod apache or tomkat (depending on what was being used) gets sticky and lots of dev.
again, i am now really curious what kiselka was originally asking for....
- kiselka0
something like this: http://www.editlet.com/
- version30
so i was right?
my statement stands