shameless
- Started
- Last post
- 238 Responses
- jevad0
Obama was in town yesterday and it was a shitstorm downtown.
I think he's going to run...
- k0na_an0k0
Obama was in town yesterday and it was a shitstorm downtown.
I think he's going to run...
jevad
(Oct 25 06, 08:36)he's amazing. man do i admire and respect that guy!
- jevad0
As do I...he is one of the only people in the DP with enough charisma and balls to seriously challenge.
Alas...I think it's a little too soon.
- mrdobolina0
obama should be VP.
as much as I agree with both of you, there a 40 million hillbillies that are not trying to vote for a black guy. Like it or not.
- k0na_an0k0
the black vote would be through the ROOF though.
and let me tell you... black folks know how to raise the roof nah mean.
RAISE THE ROOF
*does raise the roof hand gestures above headah yeah.
- ********0
Just coming in at the end ... I think it's too early for Obama to run, even though he is amazingly popular within the Democratic ranks and would definitely get more people out to vote, I just do not think politically he has served in office enough.
2012.
- k0na_an0k0
nah man. i'm running in 2012. that guy don't stand a chance against me and my running mate.... an ak-47.
- mrdobolina0
franken had a very good point about rush limbaugh's comments today.
rush should do like other radio shows have to do, actually research things before you run your mouth about things. contact an actual parkinsons doctor, instead of just making blanket statements that he isn't qualified to make.
I find this to be entirely indiciatvie of lots of the pundits on tv and radio these days.
- k0na_an0k0
don't get me started on franken
- mrdobolina0
at least he checks his facts.
- k0na_an0k0
really?
Franken claims Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes co-directed the infamous 1988 "Willie Horton attack" TV ad during the Bush-Quayle presidential campaign (Lies, page 61 (paperback, p. 65)). The truth? Ailes worked for the Bush camp in the election, but he had nothing to do with the ad; and neither did official Bush-Quayle organizers. The notorious piece was produced by an outside third party called the National Security Political Action Committee.1 Even salon.com, surely a Franken-friendly web site, has reported that the ad had "no provable ties to the Bush campaign" and "according to the official books, they had absolutely nothing to do with it."2
(Note to Franken: Maybe a good number of footnotes or endnotes aren’t a bad idea after all. And maybe getting your facts straight is not a bad idea either.)
stumbled across that the other day by accident.
//filled with facts and truth
- mrdobolina0
frankenlies.com sounds like a completely unbiased source.
The guy has 14 harvard fact checkers on all of his books.
How many does rush have?
nann.
- mrdobolina0
why have the beef with franken though? and not rush, except on this MJF thing?
- mrdobolina0
I mean if you hate his jokes and his nasally voice, that is completely acceptable... but otherwise, why?
- k0na_an0k0
so quick to dismiss.
check the notes at the bottom of each lie. the site has fact checkers as well.
and franken isn't biased? haha.
like i said. don't get me started. what's good for the goose is good for the gander with franken vs. rush pal.
- k0na_an0k0
why have the beef with franken though? and not rush, except on this MJF thing?
mrdobolina
(Oct 25 06, 09:36)don't put words into my mouth or switch around my words to work with you. i dislike both rush and franken if it wasn't apparent enough above.
- k0na_an0k0
I mean if you hate his jokes and his nasally voice, that is completely acceptable... but otherwise, why?
mrdobolina
(Oct 25 06, 09:37)what does it matter? did i ask you why you hate rush? i could give a fuck.
you might want to do the same.
- k0na_an0k0
lunchtime.
have fun.
- mrdobolina0
wow, are you defensive.
- k0na_an0k0
if you say so