Global warming...
- Started
- Last post
- 1,047 Responses
- mrdobolina0
no aliases here, just me. everyone knows my real name. unlike you, coward.
- mpfree0
he must be responding this keeps getting bumped.
some negative retort I suppose. your opinion have no impact and never will
hahaha this ignore thing is fucking ACE!
+1 for QBN
- Seff0
if you don't believe the Earth is 14,000 years old, you got a problem with yourself
- Seff0
i think mpfukstick has seriously gone off the deep end - again
- mrdobolina0
the combination of rogaine, cialis and anti-depressants is a dangerous cocktail
- ********0
i just have to log out to see the madness again.. just a sec.
- ********0
ouch...
phew.. logged in again
- mpfree0
Very interesting read.
Science Has Spoken:Global Warming Is a Myth
http://globalwarminghoax.wordpre…
and
http://globalwarminghoax.wordpre…
- ********0
You might as well of linked http://www.desperateclown.com , mpfree. Don'tcha think?
- mpfree0
mrdobolina and that liberal gang, you bumpin' this again?
one can only guess
hey where'd garett_west go, he'd like some of that information
- ********0
Nice, he's got me on ignore, so I guess he won't be able to hear me call him an embarrassing degenerate who has failed life miserably.
- mpfree0
Well, as the debate rages, we find that there really are two kinds of “scientists.”
There are those who look at facts and make their judgements based on what they know.
Their findings can be matched by any other scientist, using the same data and set of circumstances to reach the same conclusions. It’s a age-old practice called peer reviewing. It’s the only true science.
And then there are those who yearn for a certain outcome and set about creating the needed data to make it so. Usually you will find this group of scientists greatly dependent on grants supplied by those with a specific political agenda who demand desired outcomes for their money.
Let’s just take NASA, for example - the most trusted name in American science.
A lot of NASA scientists have fallen into this trap. Environmental science has become the life-blood of the space program as the nation has lost interest in space travel. To keep the bucks coming, NASA has justified shuttle trips through the use of earth-directed environmental research. And the budgets keep coming.
At the same time, many of NASA’s scientists come with a political agenda in great harmony with those who advocate the green agenda. And they’re not above using their position to aid that agenda whenever the chance is available.
--
http://globalwarminghoax.wordpre…
valid points
- ********0
let those who know have a word. and at least there's no paypal button:
- M0NEYCIDE0
mpfree you are a conspiracy theorist...the zillions of scientists that have had peer reviewed factual studies and are coming to these conclusions ARE NOT TRYING TO FOOL ANYBODY ! really they're trying to do something...like science...and helping the earth. really. they're not bad people.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/busin…
/\ bad people. this should be posted in the oil prices thread but fuck it. might as well cover this shit on all fronts.
- M0NEYCIDE0
if there's a reason for a hoax, a profitable one, it'd be to do what Bushy is doing and all the corporations that are denying and throwing the dirt in your eyes. they're profiting by having less done about the environment, they're profitng by coming up with global wamring conspiracy bs... keeep pump up your BMW big boy, it's healthy and makes em money
- material-10
globalwarminghoax.word...
valid points
mpfree
(Jan 13 07, 11:06)====
haahhaha, I guess he was hoping we wouldn't see the date, hahahaha....
'by Arthur B. Robinson and Zachary W. Robinson Copyright 1997'
- material-10
haha at me for not seeing the date on the second link, hahahaha....
- material-10
'The question now is; can it be stopped? And more importantly, will we even try.$ e target. The new scheme to grab the loot is through environmental scare tactics.'
===
what is the loot all these hippies are grabbing?
- TheBlueOne0
Written about a different topic, but nonetheless applicable:
"(It) is one of the defining aspects of conservatism. They have a stunted sense of empathy and an undeveloped ability to understand abstract concepts. It makes them unable to fashion any solutions to common problems, which they blame on "poor character" because they cannot visualize themselves ever being in a vulnerable or unlucky position through no fault of their own. Until it happens to them or someone they know, in which case they never question their philosophy as a whole but merely apply a special exemption to whichever particular problem or risk to which they have personally been exposed."