is it bad?
- Started
- Last post
- 26 Responses
- garett_west
that this morning in our status meeting i explained for a little over 10 minutes the difference between a .gif and .jpg, and what each should be used for and why... to one of the sr. art directors?
then, when i said "you can also now use a .png" the other sr. art director asked what a .png was, so i spent the better half of 10 minutes explaining to him what it was.
is that bad? it's the blind leading the blind here.
- Jaline0
the .gif and .jpg parts = BAD
- Nairn0
See Hills? Run for 'em.
- winter0
aren't you tired of being on vacations? get a real job dude.
- UndoUndo0
take Nairns advice
- ozhanlion0
I think it is good. at least there is someone to explain it. we don't want to see 200kb two color jpegs anymore!
- Jaline0
at least it's not terribly difficult to explain and get paid.
- xenicon0
persona non grata?
- Concrete0
Not sure why it would take 10 minute to explain a png?
- ozhanlion0
well it is better than they are explaining you what is the algorithm behind of a gaussian blur.
you get the credits. keep it up.
- spendogg0
what is the .png file for anyway?
- tkmeister0
uhmm, sr ad should know things like that...
he should be fired.
- Concrete0
Papua New Guinea
Pencil Necked Geek
PNG's Not GIF
Passive Night Goggles
- Jnr_Madison0
Portable Network Gagging.
- Concrete0
Graphic!
- kyl30
thanks for that little peek into your world, geedubs
- UndoUndo0
png's support transparency ver well but are slightly heavier than gif and jpeg
- Nairn0
Oh, well, hey - tomorrow's just going to get better, when you have to explain why NOT to use M$oft's new 'jpg' replacement standard,
http://www.theregister.co.uk/200…
Bloody hell..
- UndoUndo0
f*cking Micro$oft money making machine
- ozhanlion0
true.
- xenicon0
is that you Juan Valdez?
hola!