< NYTimes Refresh
- Started
- Last post
- 11 Responses
- Darrell
Interesting. What do others here think of this? Does anyone know who is responsible for this?
- nooner0
yaaaawwwn....
- ********0
i like how they have used type treatment of differnt strucutre
- mg330
Zero hierarchy, little color, no way to identify priority elements and destinations, too long, too much information on one page.
I could have simply said "looks like an f'ing newspaper," and likeminded people would have known exactly what I meant.
- ********0
one of the best info design i have seen so far
- jamble0
I thought when I saw it this morning it looked cack. I then wondered why it would get NTB coverage but then I thought it would because it's a redesign of a big brand no matter what it actually looks like.
I don't like it, I think the type and headlines look terrible and botched together.
Sorry but I don't see why the fuss. If you want a nice newspaper site, visit the International Herald Tribune.
- phatlee0
Woah, that's awful !!!
- ********0
looks like a blog
- ldww0
http://www.subtraction.com/archi…
i forget what it used to look like.
- jamble0
i forget what it used to look like.
ldww
(Apr 3 06, 08:33)I'm in the wrong game, if someone asks me to redesign their site, I make it look and behave better than before but it would appear that is just creating more work for myself!
- ********0
its well structured and nice use of type and case
- mg330
its well structured and nice use of type and case
dinky
(Apr 3 06, 08:50)
--------------------------------...For who? People with ADD?