Faith Schools
- Started
- Last post
- 336 Responses
- discipler0
you called me a dork. That's not nice.
- -scarabin-0
also, please explain just wtf "kindergarten rules" are and how you're not using them.
- -scarabin-0
talking shit in other threads such as the "." thread also popular at the moment isn't nice either.
but i'm grown up enough to look past it and know it's not relevant in an argument.
refusing to answer because i said the word "dork" seems like a kindergarten rule.
- discipler0
dobs, NCSE is a reactionary organization supported by philosophical naturalists who are up in arms and terrified of the growing ID movement. The discovery institute website lists the numerous places where they have misquoted and outright lied to get thier agenda across. They are on the same level as Talk Origins. They hold no credence with me.
- mrdobolina0
wow, discipler. I was sitting here waiting for you to say something like that.
will the creator ever be proven? no. thus it isn't science.
- discipler0
agreed - science that tries to prove a creator, isn't science.
- mrdobolina0
Creationists draw up these lists to convince the public that evolution is somehow being rejected by scientists, that it is a "theory in crisis." Most members of the public lack sufficient contact with the scientific community to know that this claim is totally unfounded. NCSE has been exhorted by its members to compile a list of thousands of scientists affirming the validity of the theory of evolution, but although we easily could have done so, we have resisted such pressure. We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!
- mrdobolina0
how is ID science then? it says there is a creator.
- -scarabin-0
they're playing by kindergarten rules though, dobs!
- discipler0
nice copy an paste, dobs. As I told you, the NCSE lacks credibility with me.
This post and the respective comments might help you understand the difference between ID and Creationism:
- discipler0
dobs, i can't keep going around in circles with you on this, it's tiring.
ID observes specified complexity in biological systems and studies it. That's all. It just so happens that the implications of the science, point to a designer.
- -scarabin-0
it points to evolution.
- discipler0
much like the implications of neo darwinian dogma of unguided evolution are clearly atheistic/naturalistic.
- -scarabin-0
evolution isn't unguided.
it's guided by the deaths and sucesses of natural mutations.
- mrdobolina0
what religion is william dembski, discipler?
- deep_throat0
evolution is guided by environmental pressures you idiot!
how do you not understand THAT much????
- discipler0
hahaha scarabin. wow, i hope you don't expect to be taken seriously. Here's a suggestion - learn what each position actually teaches and then you can come back and discuss.
- discipler0
see what I just told scarabin, leap_goat.
- discipler0
What is evolution's prominent proponent Richard Dawkin's religion, dobs?
There are agnostics, muslims and jews that make up the ID community, dobs. What's your point? Oh, probably the same misguided point you always try to make.
