< Quiksilver
- Started
- Last post
- 44 Responses
- IRNlun60
10 times better than their last site but still lacking. I think billabong does the best job as far as surf companies go.
http://www.billabongpro.com/jbay…
just nice and simple...
- ralphy0
every freaking day jpea, every freaking day.
- spk0
i hated that spinning cube that didnt catch my clicks and left...
love quicksilvers shit though... got some qs tennies on right now
- jevad0
that billabong pro site is weak
is that standard by which all other lifestlye/sport sites should be set. And I love they redo the site every season....
- ralphy0
speaking of surfco sites, where is that _'____ site paul?
- dirtydesign0
Agreed. Burton is a great site.
So is http://www.gnu.com/ and
http://www.reef.com/By the way, check out the Miss Reef section.
- jevad0
yeah that reef site is tight
- F_180
sites OK. i'd expect a little more fro quiksilver, but overall i think it does its job well.
- d5ive0
HAHA! The Reef site is tight when it comes to the g-strings.
- gabe0
- Jaline0
I prefer
http://www.roxy.com/ and
http://www.billabong.com/Same company for Roxy, anyhow. Half of my friends surf. Ssurfers only seem to wear Quiksilver or Billabong clothing.
- Jaline0
Yeah, that Burton stuff is nice. I think my Burton snowpants can blind anyone by themselves. Combined with the light reflected off the snow and yeah.
- F_180
not really digging billabong or roxy. burton set the bar super high with their site.
686 has an ok site as well....
http://www.686.com/but for all the great gear some of these companies put out, you think their sites would reflect that a little more.
- doggy0
better than their last one. nav is a pain in the ass though. breadcrumbs dont work in firefox. I'll still bye their goodies even though the previews/pics take so long to load!
- agentfour0
mmm average
i think the nav is my favourite thing funnily enough...haters!
: )
- jevad0
yeah but gabe - where on their print ad's do they use a 3d cube?
nowhere
- bk_shankz0
I think its nice
- BrigadeDesigns0
I don;t think i can say much mor than's already been said-- as far as your basic board company site, it's not bad, though like almost everyone else here, I'm not a fan of the nav (they should really re-define teh button sizing).
It could stand to be a little more organic, too-- maybe it's just me, but I like to have the menu accessible at all times, and maybe fit a little more seamlessly into the background.
Folks have mentioned Burton as a good standard to follow, and I'd have to agree-- Nixon's not a bad one either:
www.nixonnow.com
- kbags0
Not terribly impressed, though they'd probably say the same about me.
- fate_redux0
wow, lots of lurkers in this thread!
