logo check
- Started
- Last post
- 25 Responses
- vburo0
now i see it.
nah, not to be bothering about, but thx for the warning.
- vburo0
easy, i cannot connect to site.
- vburo0
thx for your help all!
if you still find something that is way too close to this.. please bump this thread or shoot me a mail!
cheers,
- easy_target0
similar to
- dippy0
ah, got it.
- vburo0
the company is specialized in retouching alu-frames and metal in architectural structures. they use highly advanced techniques and material (such as powdercoating) for this. when their work is done it is invisible, hence the finesse and fairly low contrast on the logo.
- vburo0
" if it looks too familiar to people, it defeats the purpose of having a distinctive brand mark."
i agree. but this is barely a brand mark as it doesn't communicate at all at that level. besides it is not really a brand, it's solely an identity for a small delivering services rather then selling products, i am still working on the name. and the type as well.
was just wondering about the image i created.
- mevsthem0
reminds me of a nicotine patch
- james-0
yea janne, yours looks dope
if i didn't like you, i would steal it
;)
- gruntt0
i have that tatooed on my ass.
is that where you saw it?
- mevsthem0
yeah to vorm
i think you should be fine.
- dippy0
but I wrote that without reading your last post.
too slow again!!!!!!!!!!!
- mevsthem0
yeah
- dippy0
janne, I want to say that I've seen it before, too, but I have no proof. But that should be reason enough to not use it -- if it looks too familiar to people, it defeats the purpose of having a distinctive brand mark.
- vburo0
great.
so none of 'em is exactly the same.
'a close call' is not relevant imho.
especially if the branche is completely different and the company in question is very small.
- james-0
*cracks whip
who's your daddy
- dippy0
james is on the ball!
- vburo0
save, link me up ya cunt.