is it still considered a rip-off?
- Started
- Last post
- 31 Responses
- fusionpixel
Even though this site was published in 2001
http://www.threeoh.com/may1/2001…
and this is a current site:
- tny0
ouch
- gruntt0
dang.
- danthon0
I don't see it
- danthon0
//
- dippy0
The manifold witness site is copyrighted 2001 also (see bottom left). So it's not current anyway.
- ********0
hmm.
- liquid0
yikes
- fusionpixel0
So... is it considered a rip off? what do you guys think?
- Gorbie0
those fuckers at threeoh have no shame.
- seed0
Are you freaking kidding? What a n00btard! That's a complete rip. What difference does the year make?
- sureshot0
woohieee
- Point50
I think the word nOObtard was copyrighted in 2001 also
- vburo0
those fuckers at threeoh have no shame.
Gorbie
(Feb 10 05, 14:23)I concur. All my respect for them just vanished like snow for the sun. Fuckers.
- dippy0
seed, it's ok. Calm down now. We're seeing it too. It's just that some of us are too jaded and cynical about rips and we like having a bit of fun with every one we come across.
- Point50
SOMEBODY THROW A CHAIR!
- seed0
Are you still considered a moron even though you posted that like 30 minutes ago?
Sorry, it's just such a blatant rip coupled with a very stupid question. Like if I wait a few years I can rip off any site I want.
- k0na_an0k0
SOMEBODY THROW FUCKIN SEED!
haha
- fusionpixel0
wow, you are a genious,.
- k0na_an0k0
SOMEBODY THROW THAT GENIOUS!
- seed0
Maybe this is a joke and I am the moron. BTW, you spelled genius wrong.