New WDDG
- Started
- Last post
- 67 Responses
- plamenski0
It's Google friendly.
- kpl0
it is.
and in the end they will be much better off because of it.
- monoblanco0
BUMP
BUMP
BUMP
- woodyBatts0
Am i the only one...but I don't like it...at all.
That phoenix burning think was cool before they put up the site though.
- JamesEngage0
i'm sure they are feeling the benefit
- JamesEngage0
it's like a 'splatoon' off of SMTV (in the UK) all a bit cliched
- JamesEngage0
it's like a 'splatoon' off of SMTV (in the UK) all a bit cliche'd
- Jnr_Madison0
Yeah, I liked the buring phoenix too.
- driftlab0
meh... I dunno. I liked their previous one a lot. This one doesn't really do it for me.
- woodyBatts0
maybe i'm only speaking for myself here, and i am very cautious to say this, being that i am against gratuituous flash animations, shape tweens and the lot but...
FUCK WEB STANDARDS
- kpl0
well fuck you buddy.
- EMGEE330
Jack Kevorkian themes are the next big frontier in web design.
- JamesEngage0
shame web standards are, er... standard.
- JamesEngage0
I actually meant 'aren't ' but has a good meaning either way!
- jpolk0
funny how standards compliant design doesn't work correctly/consistantly in any browser.
- gabriel_pc0
funny how non-standards compliant code doesn't either.
- JamesEngage0
all the css sites i see look the same... oversized borders, and totally evident that they are made up of components... at least with tables people disguised them!
- jpolk0
true, but when's the last time you saw a link to validate non-standards compliant sites.
- gabriel_pc0
the problem with a lot of the standards compliant sites out now is that they were designed by coders, not designers. We're only not starting to see more and more visually impressive stuff as standards are being more widely used.
- gabriel_pc0
er....change 'not' to 'now'