who has been watching?
- Started
- Last post
- 54 Responses
- slag_you_off0
he was the only one who checked in to work that day who wasnt there after they found the gun in the bookstore. his prints were on the gun, he worked there.
- jevad0
yeah I saw the same program mate...and thats what my first post in this thread was about...but a lot of it doesn't add up...there's too much in it that you can discount.
Back...and to the left...
- slag_you_off0
like they said the movement of the head has very little to do with where they were shot.
even I know that from my shhoting days.
- shutdown0
what about the claims of the smell of gunpowder from the knoll?
from what I gather evidence presented to the warren comission was either ignored or "lost" how can they create a verdict with that?
- slag_you_off0
there have been 2 commisions since the warren, one. no one has found anything.
nothing happened. smell of gunpowder from thge knoll..
right then case closed. wtf?
- unfittoprint0
JFK, his brother, MLK...
freedom. ma non tropo.
- jevad0
I think it would be dangerous to jsut accept other people's view kez.
I spent too many months in high school doing my thesis on this and there is just too much shit that doesn't add up.
- slag_you_off0
Jevad, I dont. Ive read a couple of books, and the programme seemed convincing to me.
The facts seem to be Oswald shot 3 bullets, one missed, two hit, then he legged it. They found him, he was placed at the scene, fingerprints etc. He was a top knotch shot too.
everything else is circumstancial or heresay. If there are facts to back up a conspiracy, I havent seen them.
Its the same shit as when Diana died. She couldnt possiblyjust die of an accident, the royal family were involved and charles hired a hitman to run them off the road.
rubbish. It not taking one point of view, its taking the only resonable point of view and waiting to be convinced otherwise. Im open to the fact that something went on, but there is no evidence. Things that dont add up not equate a govermental conspiracy, you just dont know all the facts.
- shutdown0
Oswald was a good shot, he was well trained in the marines yet he supposedly left finger prints on a gun hidden in the book store
That seems to me like either very stupid mistake for someone who I would say is intelligent (not for shooting the president if he did) or he's been setup.
If he worked for the CIA or whatever then he would have a bit of knonce to not just leave a gun lying around surely?
- jevad0
unless...like kez sayd (and many others)..he wanted to get caught for the infamy...
- slag_you_off0
that programme seemed to say that that was the way the way he was.
he defected to russia, which seemed a bit self important, and he tried to defect to Cuba, but they didnt want him.
- soda0
I caught the doc on the BBC and it did shatter a few of my illusions (oliver stone induced mainly to be honest. . . but in the defence of him he did say it was a dramatisation based on Garrissons book, a cop out maybe but it is a movie based on one man's opinion)
Anyhow the more I think about it considering the stuff on the doc the more it makes sense.
As Kezza said, if it was Oswald that doesn't mean he wasn't a puppet programmed to assasinate Kennedy. It's pretty easy to influence people who want to go in a certain direction and we know the US researched that kind of 'mind control'. Oswald came across as someone who wanted to be remembered for making a difference and someone like that would be putty in the right hands.
I think he was set up, he probably did it but did he act alone? I don't think so. The last (clinton instigated) US commission set up to investigate the assasination found in favour of a probable conspiracy.
I reckon Kennedy wasn't going to get out of there alive in all honesty, there was no way that was going to happen so it was set up as an ideal place for Oswald to do the crime.
The US government would never of done it themselves, they wouldn't be that stupid. Just put all the pieces in place (lax security, unusual turn in the road, Oswald, evidence, etc. etc)and watch the fireworks.
It's the way America has instigated regime change abroad remember!
Anyways thats my 2cents, have a look at the photos on this site: http://www.prouty.org/
more conspiracy but he was the real 'General X' from the movie and the photos are interesting to say the least!
- soda0
actually scratch all that.
just read Kezza's comments about his 'shooting experience' again...I think he did it.And Bobby.
And MLK.
And JR.
And phil mitchell....
kezza, when's it going to end!?!?!
- ********0
Me. It's pretty wild. I like the fact that with every year they have better forensic evidence to make these crazy theories. F'ed up shit. On that note, I once sat and watched a parade for Fidel Castro in Windhoek, Namibia. He's in cahoots with the Socialist bastards in Africa like Sam Nujoma and a real dictator Robert Mugabe who should be shot. Murderous idiot!