Amazing Idea
- Started
- Last post
- 26 Responses
- Dr_Jay0
Seems like a plan with many flaws (the first one being that it screws musicians).
I'm not sure exactly how the music copyright laws work, but I have a feeling it wouldn't take very long for the music companies to kill a plan like this.
When a company buys a copy of photoshop, that doesn't give them the right to use the same copy on every computer in the company, right? If the music laws aren't based on licensing (like software), it wouldn't take them very long to catch up.
- mitsu0
if isp's keep getting subpeoned people will probaly quit buying records just to spite them the record labels, joint effort or not...
- joyride0
Interesting logic here.
- Buy one share of a company.
- Be able to download songs and albums for a small price.
- All because your an owner of the company.If that logic works why do companies have to buy many copies of software. Wouldn't all the shareholders be able to get the software for whatever price that company sets??? I'm pretty sure it won't stand up. I wish it would. But oh well.
- unknown0
the diff between software and music is that software has laws already in place to not allow it.
music doesnt.
therefore this is why he says... get rich quick and have more money then the RIAA and lobby like mad
- Bluejam0
Instead of charging/buying the downloadable music why not charge the use of/buy the software capable of downloading the music?
- robert0
I think it brings the inflated artist back down to reality.
They will make their money of merchandise and performances.
I will buy my $20 share!