Quick Site Check
- Started
- Last post
- 9 Responses
- mcLeod0
looks good *thumbs up*
nitpicky critique--> try some uniformity with the logotype and the tag line.
- noneck0
Thanks.
You're right about the logos. The square is just a compact variation, and doesn't need to be at the bottom of the page, it's pretty redundant.
Consider the little logo gone.
Anything else?
- freshmode0
I would allow for a bit more space. Make it a bit wider. Maybe about 50 pixels. It looks a bit to constrained right now. I am sure it is for 640 x 480 but I think you will be safe if you leave the area a bit.
Make the nav text a bit larger and easier to read.
I would like to see a bit more padding where the text is at. Pretty close to the edge. Just open the space up a bit.
Over all it loos OK. Not the best, can improve, should improve. Because the page lacks content, it looks even more so when everything is really small and tight.
FRESH!
- noneck0
Thanks for the feedback.
Been doing the acrionscript/generaor thing for so long that I'm nervous when I pull my head out to make something pretty.
You're right though freshmode, it ain't "OMFG!!1" but it ain't garbage either.
Thanks for the comments.
- dznrguy0
i like it. and since i work with noneck, why wouldn't i? hey noneck??? can you add some zip, and make it all neato? maybe a couple animated gif's?? that one with the construction worker is a nice one.... OH>>> and while you're at it, how about some bubble letters???
haha.. jk
trying to bug you like your clients do.peace out.
- noneck0
Yeah, you can get some zip.
It costs extra though, $50 per page for extra zip.
- dznrguy0
:P
- mrming0
Letterspacing between e & x on the logo needs looking at - typography needs tidying up in general.
Margins are too mean -
text column narrower + margins wider = typographic niceness.
Like the colours!
- neeko0
looks good man. i agree with what everyone else has said so far...
the second tag line on the image is sort of throwing off the balance, IMHO... I would be tempted to scrap that, if the client allows it and move the logo onto the image... which would also save you some of that header room and move the content higher up on the page... just an idea though... not sure it would work, but thats what came to mind when i first looked at it.