SITE CRIT (kinda)
- Started
- Last post
- 16 Responses
- ********
- shellie0
the second cept on IE on a mac the "About Us" link breaks down into 2 lines.
but its soooo small. how will you fit all that content into that little box without scrolling for miles.
and its a little bare. but much better than the first.
- piperboytoy0
http://www31.brinkster.com/aav3/…
this is better.
- ********0
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that the second one isn't finished.
Yeah, I'll probably make the i-frame bigger & use some stock photos.
Thanks
- shellie0
everyone is so pro iframes.. which is cool for sites like this. most dont mind using IE to view the site.
but i hope you have some kinda browser sniffer.. because there are still a lot of poeple who use netscape. since this is for a non design type company, you cant expect the visitors to this site to go and download or install anything. looks like their clients are law offices and the like. have you ever spent time in a law office? many of those guys dont know the difference between IE and NS and they need help getting to their email.
i dont see why you couldnt use frames to achieve the same look at have it cross browser to reach a larger crowd. it should be very easy.
- lifeinsodium0
do iframes not work in any version of netscape?
- shellie0
@lifeinsodium - netscape 6 and any version after that i think. im pretty sure it does but nobody should have to upgrade their browser to view a site like that.
however i havent tried to see how netscape 6 handles it. if it has any quirks or alignment issues.
@antonelli - you can also use scrollable layers. you can high and reveal them with the buttons. thats cross browser.
- lifeinsodium0
but i want to have that really cool scrolling iframe effect that NT has on the left.
*cries*
- shellie0
make 2 versions?
k10k's evil browser version is just the newsfeed. but at least if your stuck using only NT you can still get some information.
- shellie0
NT=NS.. whooops.
- lifeinsodium0
Two versions. Hmm. I like that.
- chilaquil0
2nd one is better. 1st one is pretty ugly.... sorry.
- lifeinsodium0
oh yeah, i forgot to answer the original question.
second one.
- ********0
*bump
anyone else?
- dequinix0
Wait.
Are you serious about which is better? Like, seriously?
Just figrued you were being uber-sarcastic.
- ********0
c'mon ppl! :) I'm trying to prove something to someone.
- jox0
I honestly don't understand why the 1st one is even an option!? 2nd one, of course!