Ban the internet
Out of context: Reply #63
- Started
- Last post
- 174 Responses
- ********0
By using "nads" spongebobn I was just trying to talk in a language that Discipler could understand.
I'm open to criticism of Evolution. Shoot. That's how science advances. They're are holes in the HUMAN fossil record for sure, but we have enough fossils of other types of evolutionary steps to tell us how the process works (Dinosaurs - birds, e.g.) We can ASSUME similar processes are at work in human evolution, but it's an working hypothoses.
ID is all about knowing the answer and finding the evidence ot proveit. Prima facia that is NOT a scientific process and calling it one is playing fast and loose. It's just sloppy.
I bvelieve in the process of sceince. I also have faith that their is something divine about our existence here - but the bible ain't nothing but a good story out of many about the human condition.