animal cruelty...
animal cruelty...
Out of context: Reply #20
- Started
- Last post
- 232 Responses
- rabattski0
how the gallery justifies it is something i think is dumb:
"She is not the first to use dead animals in her works of art - that has been done at least since the 1700s..."
yeah, so true! why not go back to slavery and child labour as well! good ol' 1700's.
"We think that art is of vital importance"
what imporance? i think this should be translated into: "Our gallery was going down the slope, we need cash fast and now we use the sickest shit to draw a lot of attention."