Rip?
Rip?
Out of context: Reply #38
- Started
- Last post
- 49 Responses
- mbr0
I don't know why people spend so much time talking about RIPs here.
I am mostly involved with the architecture world, and there are of course issues of originality and authenticity, but when I see a cantilever or white metal siding, I don't think 'RIP'.Imo, he borrowed the faces of the tiger-thing, and then recreated everything else. They do not look at all the 'same'. That's how I'd look at it, and to my understanding, that's how 'tracing' or using scanned images is defined with regards to copyrights - does it look like the original. If this is a RIP, then 90% of the vector work out there are RIPs.
Most importantly, the ts are kind of nice, and the other images looks decades, if not more, old.