Mel Gibson...
Mel Gibson...
Out of context: Reply #16
- Started
- Last post
- 47 Responses
- xrusos0
c'mon cy, you have to admit it was clever.
of course it was coming from an opposing side with a clear and deliberate agenda to discredit the journalistic integrity displayed by the Times. it wasn't hiding it's bias, just enlightening us to the unspoken side of things.
it had to make you think, "whoa, good point... didn't think of it that way..." right?
(all in all, i agree with you though, i'd rather people be unbiased - but since that's almost entirely impossible, i'd rather people be upfront with their bias.)