Good for Mel

Out of context: Reply #51

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 88 Responses
  • planet010

    according to the bbc review.

    "that as beautifully shot and well-acted as it is"

    Both of these reviews seem to focus on questioning Gibson and the story he told. Not the film itself.

    Again, never have I seen a film more questined for why it was made? The gospels are wide in breadth and this story shows a narrow glimpse of the story. That was what Gibson decided to film. Certainly to someone not familiar with the gospel accounts, this film will leave a lot of quesitons.

View thread