Donald Trump

Out of context: Reply #12526

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 12,560 Responses
  • neverscared0

    When Mr. Trump joined the meeting, Mr. Ratcliffe briefed him on the assessment. The C.I.A. director used one word to describe the Israeli prime minister’s regime change scenarios: “farcical.”

    At that point, Mr. Rubio cut in. “In other words, it’s bullshit,” he said.

    https://archive.is/2026.04.07-19…

    At no point during the deliberations did the chairman directly tell the president that war with Iran was a terrible idea — though some of General Caine’s colleagues believed that was exactly what he thought.

    The vice president thought a regime-change war with Iran would be a disaster. His preference was for no strikes at all. But knowing that Mr. Trump was likely to intervene in some fashion, he tried to steer toward more limited action.

    • trumps instincts = apocalypseneverscared
    • This is 100% a NYT whitewash of Vance for when he runs for president. This is another future access piece strat from Swan.garbage
    • However, it is interesting that they kept Thiel's ringer out of the war room.garbage
    • 100% ? phew... how do know?neverscared
    • Aside from the NYT being absolutely complacent in giving Trump a sanity bath, this journalist in particular is known for pumping the brakes..garbage
    • ..because he is scared of losing access. He's managed two Trump one-on-one's with this.garbage
    • If Trump isn't able to cancel the elections, Vance is the next man up, and Swan is already in fluffboy mode.garbage
    • is this common knowledge that he is scared of losing access? or just your projection ?neverscared
    • i dont know swan, except that one interview for axios ,, which seemed ok.neverscared
    • asfar as i remember... maybe it sucked.neverscared

View thread