canada
canada
Out of context: Reply #383
- Started
- Last post
- 395 Responses
- prophetone0
Nova Scotia enforcing $25k fine for going on a walk through the wilderness, fishing, etc
- enjoying the wilderness and related activities “aren’t necessary”
https://vt.tiktok.co…prophetone - Is that just a temporary thing to do with the wildfires?PhanLo
- Can't see them tiktok. But feel like there's more nuance than the headlinepango
- No nuance, just state up over the top fun
https://news.novasco…prophetone - Ok that headline offers more nuance
"Travel, Activities in Woods Restricted to Prevent Wildfires"pango - Yeah basically you walking or fishing in wilderness you bustedprophetone
- https://www.youtube.…prophetone
- btw this applies to private land, so you wander on your land to check fences etc there’s a hotline neighbours can call to report youprophetone
- honestly with it - considering extreme dry conditions. As someone who experienced LA fires 1st hand. Also says if u own land you’re good, just can’t host othersBrokenHD
- ya there's truth to what you said and a lot more to what you didn't say.pango
- ^ that was replying to prophetone.pango
- The information about a $25,000 fine for walking through the wilderness in Nova Scotia is not accurate. While Nova Scotia has implemented restrictions on accessneverscared
- some wilderness areas due to high fire risk, the specific penalty mentioned is incorrect. The actual restrictions are related to fire safety during periods ofneverscared
- of high fire risk. These restrictions may include: Campfires and open fires.Access to some wilderness areasneverscared
- “Related to fire safety” yes, but that’s beside the point for many, someone going for a hike now cannot, freedom pulled, there are fines, there’s a hotlineprophetone
- Easy to get in weeds but stand back and look at it, it’s temp but is it? People will comply, then it’s accepted, repeated every year possiblyprophetone
- Why? Because bad apples, classic case and 99% suffer because of it, this is unprecedented despite the reasoning, a land owner is fine but no friends allowed etcprophetone
- Fine the bejeezus out of smokers and fire people, but the other 99% should have freedom of movement, most people aren’t a fire-threat in slightestprophetone
- It’s a slippery slope, what’s next, every province follows suit b/c same reasoning applies indefinitely? One day 80% of outdoors Canada becomes off limits?prophetone
- I hope not, but there’s a chance they ease off this plan as many groups are speaking out against the overreachprophetone
- People like myself must be overreacting I guess, there's now way... oh wait a sec... New Brunswick has joined the party almost immediatelyprophetone
- https://www.cbc.ca/n…prophetone
- safety firstneverscared
- No. challenging unreasonable law is not overreacting. Your way of sensationalizing and leaving out information is overreacting.pango
- I’m not the CBC hence linksprophetone
- and you're not the link you posted. should have just posted the link....pango
- Pango this is beloved QBN it’s fun nonsense with a dash of real world, this situation is actually real, the reactions are fun nonsenseprophetone
- And I did post the official Nova Scotia press release link at top as you know so I feel I performed my QBN journalistic dutiesprophetone
- BTW it’s sensationalism and ‘ain’t no ways’ until you get a $29k ticket for walking in woodsprophetone
- Here’s a link
https://ca.news.yaho…prophetone - ya.... link only shows up when people suspect there's more to that.pango
- i'm just tired of people leaving out info or whatnot, trying to bait a specific reaction. like all those sensationalized contents. trying to get views.pango
- it's like NBQ 2.0pango
- please subscribe today and remember to smash that like buttonprophetone
- Exactlypango
- i bet pango still wears his covid mask.hotroddy
- Nope. Only n95 masks. And only when I'm sick. I don't even know what is a covid mask.pango
- Sick or during smoke season.garbage
- enjoying the wilderness and related activities “aren’t necessary”